Decision on Oil Flotation Case Clarifies Patent Validity
The court holds the core oil flotation patent valid as to claims 1 2 8 5 6 7 and 12 and finds infringement by the defendant, but rules claims 9 10 and 11 invalid. It confines the patent to critical oil amounts below 1 percent and stresses the inventor’s active role in guiding experiments.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
United States
Everson
Proment
Italy
Great Britain
Glagner
Schwartz
Kirby
Haynes Brush
Robson
Elmore
House of Lords
Minerals Separation, Limited
British Air, Concentration Syndicate, Limited
R. PC
Lord Shaw
Australia
Sweden
Chile
Cuba
Diamond Rubber Co
Consolidated Tire Co
U. S
Carnegie Steel Co
Cambria Iron Co
U.S
Smith Vs. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co
Agawam Company
Jordan
Mowry
Whitney
Wall
Ives
Hamilton
Carnegie Steel Company Verti Cambria Iron Company
District Court
Circuit Court of Appeals
Also Mentioned on This Page
Y Hennessy
Mechano
Montana
eThes Original
Hennessy ’S
Pol4s
Saba Sclera
SDC
Burma
GDC
Tennessee Mountain
Fifth Avenue
Pergoda
Hennessy’s
Butte
Heath
Onessy's
Cattermole
Uacruineae
Ana
Mandya
Neta
Diaraeter
Dorothy