Construction of the Fourth Codicil in Colling v Wilson
The case centers on whether the phrase all the rest residue and remainder of my real and personal estate in the Fourth Codicil to James Colling's will meant everything not specifically disposed of by earlier instruments. Lord Langdale held the residuary clause applied only to property not disposed of by the will or other papers, revoking residuary gifts in the will and third codicil but not substituting prior beneficial interests. The matter involved a complex interpretation of multiple testamentary documents and their combined effect on the testator's estate.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
CoLllins
Ndt
Frieds
Lord Langdale
Eadward Wood
Pigot
Alderman Humphrery
Walkington
High-street
Bloomsbury
Robt. Walkington
Pizot
M.onth
Wolfe
Messrs. Pigot
Lincoln
Didier Montigny
Wood-street
Attenborough
Crowne-street
Roe
Joseph Edward Hyder
Clamp
Aldersgate Street
Hyps Park
John
Harriet Rawlins
Atkins
Robinson
Corstable
Oxford Street
Gray’s Inn-lane
Wooler
F. Ree
Keys
Harameramith
Kensington
Serpentine
F. Roe
W.m. Smith
John M. Donald
Saint Giles’s
Isaae Tomlinson
Drury-lane
John Venten
Catody
Smith
Lincoln Court
Mc Donald
Field
Princesstreet
M‘donald
British Legion
Ransom and Co
Pall Mall
W. P
E Dudden
Coventry
Haymarket
Dadden
Thomas Fhomeor
Hammersmith
Dudden
of Ransom and Co
Bank of England
Maryuslebore
George Toppy
William Smith
Henry Reid
London and Birmingham
Rawlinson
Lord Montford
Readnight
Edgeware Road
White Lion Passage
Emma Damost
Saisbury Street
England
Bennett
Roadnight
Priconers
House of Correction
Mr. Rawlinson
Applicant
Mamma
Queen Squars
Patrick Lindon
Buckingham Palace
Agein
Gregorie
Lavis
Tothillfields Prison
Liverpool
Sligs
London
Urquhart
Wapping
West India Docks
Dfendant
Mr. Gregorie
Royal Exchange
Dendant
Bowers
James Harris
Thomas Cotten
Frances Spicer
Harris
Exton
George-street
Chelsea
Evans
St. George’s Hospital
White
Thexm
Junsu Rappery
Fanny Price
George Howard
George Swinney
Hooper’s Place
Charles Holt
Crawford
Wilton-erscent
Price
Pricoters
Queen's Bench and Exchequer Cases Salient Summary
A digest of 1830s London court notes covering Queen's Bench actions on promissory notes against Madame Vestris of the Olympic, CHURCH v. Gas Co. ruling on corporation capacity, and Exchequer actions including MaubintE v Prnett bond suit, Jones v Lanz bill issues, and criminal information against Wake. Also police reports from Mansion House, Wesleyan Street, and surrounding districts detailing theft, assault, riot, fraud, and public-nuisance cases with brief outcomes and remands.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Queen's Bench
Humphrey
Joshua Rose Anderson
Madame Vestris
Anderson
Keight
Charles Rickarby
Bridge House-place
Newington Causeway
Rickarby
Jerrard C Fee-House
Rickardy
Church
THE
Equitable Gas Company
Lord Denman
Assumpsit
East London Waterworks Company
Court OF Exchequer
Maubidte
Prnett
Darlington Bank
London
Erle
Mary Pigott
John Pigott
Darlington
Middleton, Janson
Teesdale
JONES
Jones v. Lanz,—Mr. Simkinson
Edwin Jones
Richard Lane
Messrs. Durant and Co
Temple
Messie. Durant and Co
Also Mentioned on This Page
LAW
Rolls’ Court
Chichester
Horesty
John Abel Smith
Wake
Sheffield
Parker
Mr. Wake
P.S
Mansion House
Rush
Apollo
Monarch
Bow Street
Vinegar- Yard
Lincoln’s Inn
Mr. Minshull
John Dodd
Moore
Covent-garden Market
Bzattom GA
St. George the Martyr
Sibley
Duke
Davies
Beadle
Ireland
Worenip Street
Broughton
Grove
Barrett Wadden
Henry Bennett
James Carroll
Codd
Bethnal Green
Barker
K Division
Messra
Cooke and
Murrell
Sach
Res
Scotland
Walker
Miss Walker
Atifield
Mias Walker
Thames Police
Daxine Ropsery
John Harding
Greenwood
Regent’s Canal Dock
Iewis
Fogg and Evans
Tharmes
Stepney Causeway
Fogg
Wingrove
Old Bailey
Roadern
Headfasta
Regent’s Canal
Mr. Pinto
Pinto
AL Cann
Asme
Peter Crerer
Rotherhithe
Paipps
Jabez Grimble
Reynolds
Joan Harris
Thomas Oelahunt
Mr. Little
Daniels
Wood