INTERMENTS INIRELAND AND COERCION BILL DEBATE
Discussion on a bill brought by Mr Mac Kinn on interments and ejectments in Ireland. Lord and Commons debates push for inquiry into Baltinglass ejectments and a coercion bill to combat Irish crime, weighing penalties and civil rights.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Mackinnon
James Granau
London
Lymington
William Scott
Drescosir
Baltinglass
Galway
Jauis Graham
James Graham
Old Subscriber Epistles and Public Notices Debate Law
A compilation of letters and notes from readers discussing law reform Lord Brougham and the Spectator actions. Includes questions about army money, church parish duties, guardianship, and transportation ideas via rails and locks, with several clerked opinions and advisory stances.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
A. C
Weekly Chronicle
The
Spectator
Lord Brougham
Wight
Hants
IC. D
Surrey
Afr
J.net
H. J
Aucit
H.J
H.D
Prideaux
J. L
Common Pleas
L. W.J
Gloucester
S. E
Suir Ratuwars
Journal Des Chemins de Fers
Robert Peel
Robert Peet
East Indies
China
New Holland
Panama
Suez
Gustav Tascher
Darmstad
Darmstadt
S. M
Manchester
Treland
England
Ireland
Cromvwell
Irelanus
Cromuxll
W. M.I
W. T
X.X
Doctor Howard
Stoke Newington
Bridge-street
Blackfriars
Time Calculations For Sunrise Sunset And Tidal High Water In Uriforn And Ireland
Instructions describe adjusting sunrise and sunset times by latitude and degree differences, plus adding or subtracting minutes for various ports to derive high water times. It cites specific towns Bristol Cork Falmouth Hull Milford Haven Brighton Cowes Dover Dublin Holyhead Liverpool Port Glasgow Southampton and more, and notes date references Week Sunray Lent dates lunar age and daylight length changes.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Great Uriforn
Ireland
London
Bristol
Cork
Cove
Falmouth
Hull
Milford Haven
Brighton
Cowes
Dover
Dublin
Holyhead
Liverpool
Port Glasgow
Southampton
Campaign on the Sutlej Great Victory and Peace Terms
Long April 5 1846 weekly chronicle reports Parliament vote of thanks to Sikh campaign heroes after Moodkee Ferozepore and Sobraon battles. Details set out victory, casualties, and terms of peace with indemnities, Punjab governance, and Sikh cession proposals amid Irish Coercion debate and Corn Laws concerns.
Britain Celebrates Hindu Victory and Peerages to Sir Henry Hardinge
The Territory between the Sutlej and Beas is secured, making Beas the Frontiers. Sir Henry Hardinge and Sir Hugh Gough are to be honored with peerages as the victory is hailed in the House of Commons. The Times praises timing and warns that prolonged conflict could affect American peace. The article notes Britain’s strengthened position and readiness for further actions if war is forced.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Napoleon
Locchamb
Ferczepore
Hugh Gough
Moodkee
Ferozeshab
Alimuwaa
Delhi
Ferozepore
Robert Peel
House of Commons
Harry Smith
Duke of Wellington
Loodianah
Wheeler
Godley
Sobraon
Empire
Ireland
Dragoons
Tete de Pont
Amritaur
Gholab Singh
Panchayet
Henry Hardinge
Lahore
Sutlej
Wmballab
Additing
Robert Pee
Lords
Trish
Wiliam Somerville
England
George Grey
John Roasell
James Graham
Sidney Herbert
George Bentinck
O'Connell
Smith O
House of Lords
Duke of Richmond
Commons
Beas
India
Atlantic
Public Writer Correcting a Fault in Battle Report
A public writer argues for correcting unjust impressions from Sir John Littler's Despatch about the Battle of Feroze Shah. He asserts that the onus is on truth, not publication method, and condemns unfounded charges against the Second Native Corps and the regiment's conduct. He stresses duty to rectify wrong impressions with clear evidence.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ferozeshah
John Littler
O2nd
62d Regiment at Ferozeshah Battery Charge Debated
A detailed defense argues the 62nd Regiment faced overwhelming fire at Ferozeshah on the night of the 21st, noting Maj Short’s claims, General Gough’s later order, and the commander’s directive to retire only after advancing proved impracticable, with 17 officers and 75 men lost and praise for gallantry.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Short
Littler
Hugh Gough
Ferezesnal
Baneljeney
Lavin
Piaus
JAS
Ordere KY Tie Drigadier
62D
Ferozeshah
Anughan
Sherr
Mejor Short
62Nd
Avir
Henry Hardinge
Lier
Debates over Sir James Graham and Mr Shaw in Irish politics
The text critiques Sir James Graham and Mr Shaw amid a heated debate on a Dublin Recorder plan. It argues Shaw pressed reform for personal gain, while Graham denies any improper motive, and cites past political bargains and patronage as shaping current loyalties. References include Maynooth funding, the Irish Municipal Bill, and parliamentary decorum in a stormy period.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Shaw
James Graham
Itah
Recordership
Dublin
Robert Peel
Home Office
Dublin Corporation
James Graban
Right
Baronet
Maynooth
Robert Peal
Judes Iscariot
Mr. Shaw
Ireland
Herculea Langrishe
Barataria
House of Commons
Also Mentioned on This Page
Earl of Cruscanty
Gerrard
House OF Comimons
J. Gravax
O'Consex
J. Graham
Zisc
Trelurt
B. Ryan
Sir J. Graham
Her
Europe
Hear
Lora Devon
Mr. O'Connell
Tipperary
Jackson
Lefroy
Litton
Pennefether
Blackburne
Sugden
Tuanster
Trieh
Ulster
J. B. Osborne
Burke
Lord Devon
Abe Rnder
Ami Eranger
Lord G. Bentinck
0 Connell
Hersenrr
Nish
Lord Juns Hessir
J.graham
Ives
Hait
Home Secretary
M. O'Loghlin
Mr. Drummond
Earl Grey
Ralso
Lord Althorp
Lord Stanley
Pitt
H. Baroneau
Wilson
Key
Seyven
P. Burien
Traland
Fitzoenaup
R.S. Carnw
Masten
Chester
Jervis
Q C
Justice Williams
Legal & Miscellaneous
Monnay
Inidaya
Great Britain and Ireland
Rines
Mora
Too Weekly Chronicle
Lonugn
the Sixty-Second Regiment
Sir James Graham
Shar
This is just the beginning! Our collection holds over 300 years of history, including rare newspapers, obituaries, marriage records, birth records, and so much more—most of which you won’t find anywhere else!