Debates Over Railway Use and Colonial Prosperity Persist
Newfoundland lawmakers clash over railway employment, fiscal policy, and the London mission outcomes. Opposition cites limited work, extravagant bills, and diphtheria concerns while praising delegates and questioning Royal assent on treaties.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Lapers
Serling
Culday
Mreucrat
Savings’ Bank
Tan
Trae
Se John’s Mast
Fox
Savage
United States
Els
Britain
Vis
Peretat
Wai
Culong
The
Herald
tHealth
Univer US Cass
England
London
Patriotic Association
Ney
Newfoundland
Lord Knutsfurd
Lhey
Tosquid
Goluuiat
Visiun
Washington
Gay
Lieyds
Hig Hon'golleagya
Waitsley
Looton
Lord Knutsford
Aaoguer
W. V
Waiteway
Murray
Tha Goo
Fur
John Hast
Vox
Biwsee
Weil Luvduy
Aling
Bie Spesa
Vltdr
Hoa
Hvu
Lloyd's
Charles Hox
Llvyda
Lloyds
Razard
Great Britain
Lue Buard
Helio
Huis Obgerviklons
Legislative Council debate touches on colonial rights and a cited case
The record shows A W Hanvary apologizing for absence as Meddouros speaks. Delegates to Buylind reportedly pushed for action against the Kreven and territorial rights with that nation. A reply is deemed necessary referencing the Baird v Walker case and related positions.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Select
Hia Exceliensy
Spegeh
Fox
Dawe
Murray
Greene
Geran
Mona
Rotawel
Select Commission
Wasser
United States
United State of America
Canty
Great Britain
France
Newfoundland
Moutton
Rolix
St. Avun’s
Lord Knutsford
Lia
London
Grou
Lue
Muregay
Noticn
Cusiruan
Board of Works
Nak
Evens
United States of America
Bond
Mr. Greene
Whitely
Yoo House
Ion
A. W. Hanvary
Hongentleman
Meddouros
Buylind
Auforcing
Kreven
Baird
Also Mentioned on This Page
Assembly
Taorsbay
Segveron Ganzeat
Hoo
Mc. G
Green
Shea
Hox
Socangers
Ibs
BOP
Murnar
Zoe
Geresus
Morticou
Tid Prenen
Newur Bea
Bory
Duparbueot
Tos
Lwpetal
United Kingdom
Ulwt
Budersinad
Legislative Council