Queries on Pitt and British policy amid 18th century unrest
An extensive letter from AMICUS questions Pitt’s motives, praising his integrity and listing British naval and colonial gains. It laments factional attacks and urges examination of parliamentary independence, while critiquing modern press sensationalism and printing editorials. A bishop’s critique follows about colonial ethics and treatment of indigenous peoples, then literary notices and 1762 publications.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Amicus
Pitt
Dix
Cherburgh
Belleisle
Rochefort
Boism
Boscarven
Hawke
Offorne
Saunders
Steve
Watsan
Gardizer
Young
Avia
Celrille
Wolfe
Amber
Naz Hax
Sosci Fend
Sarrington
Hodgson
Price
Hug
Wien
Closter
Great Britain
Earl of B
Spain
England
Roon
Also Mentioned on This Page
Pubric Lepcer
South Carolina
Grant
Carpenter
Charles Town
Africa
America
Alvaraz
Chiapa
C.F. H—p—t
Charlotte
Lord
Vauxhall Gardens
Ranelagh House
Winges &c
J. Newbery
St. Paul's Church Yard
Court and City Register
Rider
Lords and Commons
Rivington
J. Jolliffe
C. Hicch
L. Hawes
P. Stevens
J. Richardson
S. Crowder
Carlon
J. Robson
G. Kearfly
J. Hinxman
J. Walter
N. B
Rivington, Jolliffe, Hitech, &c
John Butley
A. B. Preeher
Queen Street
Lincoln's Inn Fields
Christ Church, Oxon
H. Woodgate
H. Woodgate, In Paternoster Row
J. Pottinger
Ave-Maria Lane
Nolw
Nuue
Liear
Red Lion Square
Joseph Harre
Maneters
Paver-nefter-bouw
Tidereas
Pattison
West Halton
Lincolnshire
Stur
Meir Ruffell and
Jenks
Exchange-alley
Flanders
Gorlitz
Prussia
Saxony
Neils
Glogau
Breslau
Wansen
Strenlen
Schweidnitz
Zaftrow
Schweide Nite
Prusha
Leipfick
Lufinkky
Schrap
Naumburgh
Dresien
Prince Henry
Berli
Themelves
Lusatia
Baron Laudohn
Daun
Empire
Altena
Holstein
Princesf Soubixe
Effen
France