Case to Remove Crucifix Over Church Screen
The court upheld removing the crucifix and related raised images citing lack of faculty. It advised maintaining liberty on sacred representations with cautious ordinary oversight and reversed certain costs, noting the two hour twenty minute judgment delivery.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Court of Arches
High Church Judgment Sparks Sharp Press Debate
The Daily Express attacks the ruling on Ornaments Rubric as misinterpretation aimed at overturning plain law. It argues the court’s decision inflames a tense religious dispute, inviting further prosecutions while showing bias against the High-Church school.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Daily Express
Hupress
Ridsdale
Hrpress
Clerical Protest Against Privy Council Judgment Plan
A circulating declaration by Rev C. S. Grueber of the English Church Union protests an alleged unconstitutional move by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council to repeal the Ornaments Rubric and undermine Reformation principles of the Church of England. The document aims to gather signatures.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Church of England
C. S. Grueber
English Church Union Office
Principle of Reformation and the Ornaments Rubric Debate
The text defends the Church of England’s Reformation as primitive Catholic teaching and condemns a Judicial Committee interpretation of the Ornaments Rubric as an attack on the Prayer Book. It cites the Savoy Conference and argues that departing from primitive custom and Catholic usage violates the Reformation principle and church law.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Church of England
Church of God
Opinion of the Evangelicals on the English Church Judgment
The Record notes broad evangelical approval of the judgment with dispute only over the eastward position. Eleven of twelve points favored the Evangelicals as they banish sacrificial vestments, condemn the crucifix, and deem wafers illegal. The Privy Council requires clear proof on sight of rites and ministers.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Privy Council
Ridsdale
Fom
Canterbury
Holy Table
Reformed Church of England
Secular View of the Judgment Ridsdale Case In Church
The Times notes the ruling on Ritualist questions is the most important yet issued. It condemns Ritualist vestments though upholds limited clerical liberty on core issues. Tooth’s Hatcham action and peaceable resolution efforts draw mixed reactions from papers and church groups.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
the Times
The
Daily News
Tooth
St. James’s
Hatcham
Court of Appeal
Ridsdale
Privy Council
Lord Penzance
Court of Arches
Waily Telegraph
Forborne
Ritualism Put Down in Church of England Policy
The piece asserts that Ritualist practices echo Rome and challenge mainstream Anglican doctrine. It notes acquittal for Ai Ledale on eastward position but indicates the Privy Council condemns the symbolised doctrine. Clergy must conform or face force as Ritualism is banished to protect the national church.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Rome
Ai Ledale
Privy Council
Pelham Dale
Arthur Tooth
Church of England
Also Mentioned on This Page
Gregg
Harborne
Nearirmingham
Lipex Py
Court of Common Pleas
Dublin
England
Spectator
Adlington
Lancashire
Barnaroo
London
East London
Barnardo
George Reynolds
Reynolds
Canon Miller
William Graham
Glasgow
Russell Gurney
Gurney
Maule
Q.C
Leeds
HareHam M
Webb
Fry
Mr. Tooth
Mr. Webb
Mr. Fry