Debate on Sebastopol inquiry and Palmerston policy
Members debate the Sebastopol inquiry and Lord Palmerston's conduct in war policy. Lord John Russell defends the expedition and criticizes press influence, while Bright urges accountability. The House votes on Roebuck's motion, rejecting the previous question by a large margin. Lords consider the crown’s measures and passage of bills.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Lord John
Ponsonby
Lord Porchester
Walcheren
France
Constantinople
Silistria
Crimea
Sebastopol
John
Duke of Newcastle
Canning
Bricur
Mr. Roebuck
House
Lord Palmerston
Roebuck
John Russell
Mr. Bright
India
China
Syria
Greece
R. Peel
United States of America
Lord Ashburton
Ashburton
Spain
Viena
Russia
Tlunears
Aberdeen
Davine Cie
London
Dbear
Tye
Elear
Heever
Comine Buaeh
Vienna
Feelimng
le Dil Teel
Wie
Poe Bitedit Tien
Aid Comites
Guy Fawkes
Sam
Lord Stowell
Sir Robert Walpole
Mr. Pulteney
Robert Peel
Tiverton
Cloud
de Lacy Evans
Sir de Lacy
Leeton
Glaapstrom
Musarz
Supsey Tembear
Janes Graham
John Wahington
Timay
Mr.Roebuck
George Grey
Epward Entice
Coventry
Joan Manners
Lord Patterston
Admiralty
French Empire
Black Sea
Mr. Diskarni
House of Lords
Rornvesk
OM. Roebuck
Scotland
Brovetlaw
Aneyar