Argument Over Corrupt Intent in Election Bribery Case
Serjeant Ballantine argues corrupt means knowingly wrongful acts with crime motive in perjury indictments. The judge and witnesses discuss refreshments, bribery, and canvassing tied to the Forster Ripley contest, with testimony on tickets, payments, and voter influence, concluding the election was pure.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ballantine
Price
Serjeant Ballantine
Lichfield
Justice Willes
Cooper and Slade
Blackburn
Serjeant
Knaresborough
Serena Ballantine
Wade
Miall
Central Committee
Oad
Mial
Forster
Mr. Robinson
Gladstone Army
Poole
Levi Alderson
Ripley mocked for rash election aid and agent abuse
The Times and Morning Star critique Mr. Ripley for trusting his agent, highlighting unlimited credits and bribery through meals and treats. They warn such conduct risks future elections and note judges may require candidates to curb expenses and ensure vouchers. Spofforth and others are contrasted as educators of candidates.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
the Times
Ripley
The
Morning Star
Bradford
Spofforth
Baron Martin
Markham Spofforth
Election rulings uphold rightful winners amid no corrupt practice
Justice Willes affirmed Colonel Dyott as duly elected with no proven corrupt practice by either candidate. Belfast reports Baron Fitzgerald declaring Mr. M'Clure duly elected and entitled to costs. He noted difficulty regarding the 200 pounds given to working men tied to Mr. Johnston.
Also Mentioned on This Page
W. E. Forster
M.P
Thompson
Mr. Kell
Brown
Mr. Wade
Mr. Ripley
Mr. Price
Continent
St. George's Hall
Kitcheman
Mr. Forster
Kell
Mahony
Mr. Illingworth
Gladstone Arms
Illingworth
Yorkshire
Sheffield
Henry Ilingworth
Pollard
East Ward
Ripley Party
George Beaumont
W. H. Wood
Boothroyd
George Cole
Cook
Anningham
Calvin Robertshaw
Silsbridge Lane
Lobley
Lockwood Stephenson