Farming's future and the landlord balance debate
A critique of Mr. Jefferies on farming security argues that tenant capital would not spark large investment without real security. It cites James Howard and others, notes Lincolnshire and Scotland show higher per acre yields with some security, and decries the landlord as an obstructive figure in future farming. The article foresees co‑operation and worker participation, examines joint stock farming, and questions a landlord‑led profits model. It also mentions Gustave Doré, Carlyle, and Mill on related cultural matters.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Jefferies
The
Social Science Congress
James Howard
M.P
Howard
Read
Earl of Leicester
Caird
John Wilson
Lincolnshire
Scotland
Mr. Jefferies
Jeffries
Gustave Doré
Pilate
New Bond Street
Thomas Carlyle
Alessandro Manzoni
J. S. Mill
Praise and critique of the Establishment defense essays
A review applauds the prize essays defending the Church of England, led by Mr Peek and featuring Mr Hole. It notes examiner impartiality by Salisbury, Hessey, Vaughan, and Ainger, while critiquing Dissenters’ portrayal as prejudiced and praising candid scholarly debate amid religious controversy.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Peek
Hole
Church Defence Association
Marquis of Salisbury
Hessey
Vaughan
Ainger
Canon Dixon
Wondon
John Murray