Lords clash over Army Regulation Bill and Royal Prerogative
Opposition in the Lords scored a symbolic but limited victory against the Government on the Army Regulation Bill. The debate featured cross-party support for the opposition, a large division tally, and questions over Crown prerogative, parliamentary independence, and future steps for the bill. The piece also notes discussions on the Ballot Bill provisions and Prince Arthur’s annuity, with royal visits to Ireland influencing public sentiment.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
House of Lords
Duke of Richmond
Earl of Derby
Lord Romilly
Commons
Earl Russell
Marquis of Camden
Earl Fitz- William
Earl Somers
Lord Stanley
Alderley
Vernon and
Vivian
Duke of Sutherland
Marquis of Westminster
Earl
W. E. Forster
Mr. Disraeli
Gladstone
Prince Arthur
Dixon
P. A. Taylor
Prince of Wales
Louise
Ireland
Dublin
England
Scotland
Lords Vote of Censure on Army Reform Policy
The Lords condemned the Government for using the Royal Prerogative to defeat the Conservative Opposition over Army Reform. The large majority is unlikely to harm Mr. Gladstone's public standing and may have limited political effect.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
House of Lords
Gladstone
Lords and Commons clash over constitutional prerogative
A London editorial argues that the Lords overrule the Commons with their privilege, threatens the Liberal government with an oligarchy, and praises Mr Gladstone's use of the Royal Prerogative to avert a constitutional crisis. It warns the Lords’ receptiveness to reform and the Ballot Bill may influence future politics.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Mr. Gladstone
Earl Granville
Duke of Richmond
House of Lords
House of Commons
Representative House
Gladstone
Lords
Commons
Legislative Assembly
Also Mentioned on This Page
Arthur Miall
Bouverie-street
Mark Lane
E.C
London
Kentish Town
Midland Railway
Cathcart Hill
Junction-road
Miall
A. Miall
Fleet-street
Bouveriestreet
Fleet Street