Naval debates and motions on Admiralty reform in Lords
In the Lords on Friday May 23 discussions covered the delay of judgments in the Reprisarem case and a motion to appoint a Select Committee to probe the Admiralty. Lord Darnley urged examining ships built in merchants yards, costs, and workforce, arguing for reform and stronger naval readiness. Lords Melville and Hawkesbury defended the existing board, while others pressed for accountability and better coordination between the Admiralty and the Navy Board.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
House OF Lords
Rippinaton
Eurl
Justice Fox
Duke of Clarence
Marquis of
Apgrcory
Ie Fox
Board of Admiralty
Aniied
Fraser
West India
Thaddine
Admiralty
Naval Commissioners
Navy Board
Lord
Lars
St. Vincent
Royal
Duke of
Clarenow
Buckinellam
Faris Fortescue
Tankenville
Romney and
Kine
Melwvelle
Admiralty Board
North Seas
Catol
Itaq
Uper
Egy
Sips
King
Lord Sanpwich
Lord Kerret
Lord Hower
Lord Spencer
Lord Cuarnam
A.S. Hasmone
West Indies
Earl SE. Vincent
King’s
Navy
the Duke of Clarence
Naval Service
Lord Lanow
Earl St. Vincent
Lord Sidmouth
Vincens
Chasge
King’s Fords
E & Eer
Frien
Irdia
Ramey
Ord
Naval Department
M&mvrite
Spain
Lord Hawkesbury
Earl
Earl of Buckinghamshire
Lord St. Vincent’s
Leeward Islands
Earl of Suffolk
Melville
Rochefort
Lord Melville
Channel Fleet
Supfolk
Lord Darmley
Also Mentioned on This Page
Imperial Parliament
Cate the