Disputed royal marriages stir debates on bloodlines
A long letter from Regulus defends the marriages of royal siblings against claims of unlawful prerogative and courtly constraint. It argues English and German noble classes share powers, notes Parliament’s role, and contrasts monarchic despotism with balanced liberty in Britain. Also covers cross remarks on Scotch politics and university patronage.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
England
William
Edward
Fhire
House of Lords
Regulus
St. James’s
Stotchmen
George the Third
Fcale
Somipals
Fordyce
Mr. Hume
Lord Mansfield
poSble
Yardyce
Downe
Neale
Earl of Litchfield
York
Dukes of Beaufort
Maribo
Earl of Radver
Lierd
Justice Mansfield
Lord Suffolk
Magdalen
Lord Foley
Fop
Two Duxes
Lord Radnor
Trinity College
Lord North
Christ’s Church
Lord Radnord
Persoral
Arran
Captain Jones
Havannah
Moro
Minster Abbey
Nightingale
Main
Earl
Montrath
Pope
Edward the Confessor
Also Mentioned on This Page
Literary Chronicle
the Gazetteer
In the
Public Advertiser
The
Public Ledger
City Theatre
Guildhall
Wilson
Niv
Palace-yard
London Evening Post
Marcus
London
Wilkes
Lymington
Harry Burrard
Sir Harry
St. James’s Chronicle
St. J *S
General Evening Post
John C—ke
O—— College
Oxford
Phillips
Purleigh
Essex
London Chronicle