Fragmentary Legal Debate on King's Power and Liberty
Partial transcription shows a historical legal discussion with judges Mansfeld, Vasey, and Willes, exploring royal prerogative, Star Chamber limits, and defense rights. It references Lilburne cases, oath refusals, and the legality of interrogatories, suggesting tensions between executive power and habeas rights in 17th century English law.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Mauilay
House of Lords
Lilburn
Earg
Willess
Juice Cate
Crosany
Cafe-Of- Norton
Justice Hatton
Common Pleas
Hatton
Cro
Tate
Seppr Conger
Ode
Sen
Ares Mae
S . Sithout
Wipeel
Foaller
Bracy
Roger Pérsons
Jjxacculer
Bath
Also Mentioned on This Page
The
Manee U Severe
Sam
Ferner
Fell
Ieee
Bingley
Mansfeld
C. J. Vasey
Afton
Willes
Gray
Duining
Trent
Sint
Charles-Tovin
South- “Carolina
General’ Association
East-India
America
Charles Town
Christophier
House of Representatives
Silvercheelee
Wilk
Fes
Pall-mally
Mente
South
Carolin
Ambrader
Mazarello
Great Ormond ‘Street
Wesrnbuth
Arlin
Bes Cley
Pamista
HIP New
Wind
W. S. Wespy
Fan
Seaman
Jane
Moran
Kie
Margipap
Clarkes
Hane
Bryson
Grenadles
Generous Planet
Smite
St. ‘Vincent's
Packet
Collins
Gadizg
Pally
Rainer
Id Tetas Diana
Hagrilon
Gold Intent
Bermedy
Barker
Globe Lotherlington
Elizabeth Holt
Good Intent
Errington
Hamburgh
Ann
Catharine
Bursta Eolin
Concord
Simpiong