Supreme Court Argues Legislative Limits on Crown Lands Licensing
The court debates whether Board of Lands and Works may grant licenses for occupation and cultivation of Crown lands under Victoria’s 1861 act. The Chief Justice and Justice Williams consider if the Board’s discretion extends to non agricultural purposes, and whether licenses were issued under proper authority or ultra vires, with implications for subsequent trespass claims. The ruling questions the act’s structure, the governor in council’s role, and the legislature’s intent to promote agriculture.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Supreme Court
Cola
Michie
Daweou
Redmond Barry
Lockwood
Masehy
Victoria
Gavienor
Py Panton
Castlemaine
Mount Almander
Lavenswood
Penton
Melburne
Luryinder
Ame
Matbourn
Henry Barkly
W. J. Hall
Tresaury
Melbourne
Vitoria
Meltogene
Bruce Skinner
C. Brace Skinner
Yarat
Anil Uhe
C. Bruce Skinner
Arponte
Crown
John Stoxyen
Advanse
Board of Land and Works Srs Jogelly Rutherland
Wood
Addro
Parsons
Bours
Beding
Ube Coleayy
Crushers J
Aha Bose
Bowrd
Counsil
Board of Land and Works
Ictha
Orus
Board For Land and Works
Inns
Ferrie
Redmond Baery
Wren
Board of Land Snd Works
Aia
England
Justice Williams
Unis Sail Board
Yen
Also Mentioned on This Page
Electric Telegraph
Sydney
Brisbane
Pleurepeamonia
Toneuis Rhichmond
Hasness
George Coppin
M.L.C
Melbourne Cricket Club
Reformer
Percy
Shopsuith
Mal ‘Bourne Gricket
Quoit
Cirr
Parey
Johnson
Mesero Fraser
Hamilton
Butterworth
Makinson
Wardill
Patterson
C. H. Jones
Bourke
Jonse
Usail
Chard
Benak
Ukeles
Thomas Fowler
Clark
Hingaton
Chancery Lane
Kilmore
Hamwet
Railways
Spencer Street
Siies
McNash
Bosd
East Melbourne Cricket Club
Malyeru Hl Cricket Club
East Melbourne
St ‘Ilde
ML Kilts
Whee Beet Moody
Marghy
M'Kenalay Murray
Haath
Amd
Buberben Reak
Joseph Paleo
Queenscipf
Deverie