The weekly review on suffrage and parliament ethics debate
A critical examination of the risks and duties of parliamentary service argues against property suffrage limits, praises independence, and notes that salaries would curb hungry representatives. The piece cites attendance burdens, historical strain, and the need for wiser legislation amid strikes and reform. It also reports on ministry prospects, nominations, and political shifts shaping the new Parliament.
Explanation by late Attorney General on Pensions Bills conduct
Mr Wood explains his conduct regarding the Pensions Bills saying he had not read the bill when he seconded Dr Healey’s motion for its introduction. He claims he learned that the wrong clause had been repealed only after information from Dr Greeves and will inform the public on the dependability of actions taken.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Northern Railway
Messra Connisi
Brvos
Kyneton
Woodend
Usmder
Lavenper
Miller
Sulbury
Conish and Bruce
Aspinall
Ireland
Geelong
Dr Greeves
St. Kilda
Streer
Francis Meeony
Murray
Francis
Wangaratta
Murray Boroughs
Argus
Woop
Greeves
Gneeves
Legislative Council
Woon
Intrano
H ¥ Ales
1St
Victoria Cavalry and Mounted Rifles
Emerald Hill
Burton
Australian Evangelist
Theatre Royal
James Taylor
Wood
Heales
Also Mentioned on This Page
MelbourNe
ARNAL
Don
Great Britain
Imba
Thérg
Messrs Cornish and
HRACE
Garrick Club
Mra Chester
Sydney
London
India
Kyte
Freemasons
Chester
Australasian Fire and Life Insurance Company
Mechanical Institute