Palladium Author Critique Sparks Mutual Writings Debate
A long, quarrelsome letter section roils readers over mathematical errors and critics of the Palladium Author. The correspondence defends the author against charges of absurdity while contrasting with remarks about Newton and other great scientists. The debate includes references to navigation fluxions, the Moon’s orbit, and editorial replies from Bath and London periodicals.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Chasipéan
Palladium
Wef?s
Mathemateks
Champion
Vanc Newton
Emerson
M’laurin
Halsey
Mr. Simpson
Woolwich Academy
Jane Neawtonetl
Simpfor
Tam
Puiro Palladium
Also Mentioned on This Page
Bira
Ted Ior
Buel
London Evening
Post
Mr. Mergs
Bath
London Evening-Post
St. James
Chemseles
Garrick T M. Derrick
Lycurgus
Nash
Ign
London
St. James’s
Richmond House
Lord Ochfort
Madrid
Manilla
Joseph Yorke
Hague
Duke of Richmond
Paris
Warsaw
Count i Branicki
Poniatowski
Czerwin
Poland
Frankfort
House of Commons
Ander
Duke of Kingston
Thar
Tyburn- -Lahe
Ibry
Angela
Anda
Calfttk
Singérée
Prosperch
Stockton
Die
Downs
Sela Io Calles Oe de Riries
Fey Gibi
India
Aed Hat
Mailauen & Spane
Long
Ann
Ns Molett
R. Baldwin
Gale &E
Retec
Plictics
Newbery' i
St. Paul's Cuuren-Yard
Deor
Excise
England
Wilkes
San
France
Fancy
Sint
Ted
Ireland
Great Britain
Caplain
J. Wilson
J. Fell
Ye Roblen
New Bond
Meil
Richardson and Equhart
Royal Exchange
Flescher
Oxford
Meff Fletcher
Hodon
Cambridge
Brherington
York
Slack
Newcastle
Meff Smith and
Soi
Dublin
Soto
Gust
de Bey
Ibl
Sun
St. Paul's
Pacenree
Gach Bottis
Netka
Allo Nanse