Debate on a permanent board of accounts and public expenditure
A lengthy debate argues against creating a new permanent Board of Commissioners of Accounts. Proposals favor two independent, supervised bodies, citing higher costs, potential abuse, and conflicts with ancient Exchequer oversight. The motion warns of debt risk, government waste, and legal questions about patents and jurisdiction. Congress, commerce, and Ireland's money bill are noted alongside naval movements and cabinet Council activity.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Board of Commissioners
Vna Eaton
Sthly
Ilegal
Court of Exchequer
Ordnance
Board of ‘Works
Tyre
Debates of the Ireland House of Commons 1763 64
A historical notice of published debates in the Parliament of Ireland during 1763 and 1764. Compiled by Sir James Caldwell and dedicated to the Earl of Chatham, this two volume edition includes remarks on Lords of Bélandy and related items. Also advertised are Mollyneus’s Case of Ireland and other parliamentary works printed for J. Almon in London.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
of Commone
Ireland
England
Privy Council of
Great” Britain
Lord Townshend
Cns
Ce Lod Mouritier
Pere’ Egmont
Queen’s Palace
Earl of Skel=burne
Bélandy
House of Commons
Frélandys
Sir Janes Caldewell, Bart
Earl of Chatham
Mollyneus
J. Almon
Burlington Houte
Piccadilly
Ichard Warren
Marybone-street
Golde
London
Europe
N. B
Langford
Pater-nofter-row
Skelton
Iin
Southwark
Bull
Iq Baths
Brown
Bristol
Waugh
Willis
Newbury J
Rai- Vaud
Paris
Warren
Also Mentioned on This Page
Conimope
Ordnary
Great Britain
Yee
Inj Ek
Cae
Hanes
Richard
Simmel
Exchequer
Sheréin
Hall
Jevied
Écogut
Britain
Portsmouth
Pace
Cathinenes
Cos
William and Mary
Graham
Riga
Ford
Ditehbara
Sunderland
Delight
Eglingeton
Rainbow
Collingwood
Weazle Joep
Young
Guinea
Prince Henry
Nottingham
Eatt Indies
Witton
Glasgow
Dispatch
Agar
Ancona
Sally
Rowe
Colfton
Caity
Thompsony
Plymouth
Leinster
Duke of Cumberland
Burningtést- Bute
Price
Mer Oe