Mutiny and court martial over India Company officer’s fate
Robert Fletcher, cashiered by a Patna court martial in 1766, appeals to the Court of Directors explaining his actions during a mutinous crisis. He contrasts the ruling with General Carnac’s earlier approach and defends his conduct as aimed at maintaining discipline and safety of the service. He references Clive, Carnac, and the Bengal officers, and cites resignations and the mutiny act as justification for officers optional resignation.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Wyaving
Lord Clive
England
Clive
General Court of the India Company
Laurence and
Caillaud
Easy India Company
Patna
Robert Fletcher
Albert Fletcher
Fentente
Goddged
Hig Utmo
Hanover
Fauare
Strin
Laurence
John Cahllaud
Cohdein
Siwe
Lord ‘Clive
Carnac
Béggal
Mongheer
Carnage
Gouneil
Calcutta
Bengal
MacPherson
Bombay
Monro
Buxar
Council
Court of Directors
Berkley-square
Robert Fretenge
Also Mentioned on This Page
Rad
Roth
Roth O
Bacherde
Beeson
Giset
N.B
Italig
Diration
Jeffrs
Princed
T. Longman
J. Buckland
E. and
C. Dilly
Poultry 5
T. Field and Co
Beatenhall
Indies
M. Gailand
Royal Academy
Frengman
Paternotter
Ateia King’s Arms
PePe
Mai
London
Price
Tols
W. Bayley
Haymarket
Newfond-threx
M.‘Pardie
Nordh-Parade
Batt
Felinge
King’s Bench
T. Greenaver
Endgate
Balfam
Tole