Lawyer Wheble case questions law of attendance in Parliament
A 1771 opinion discusses John Wheble resisting a House of Commons summons and a royal proclamation. It concludes Wheble is not legally bound to attend and that any purported warrant or proclamation is illegal, urging defense of liberty under Magna Carta and statutes. The piece reviews the process defects and the Speaker's authority, proposing legal remedies.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
House of Commons
John Whebter
J. Wheble
Morris
J. Hatsenr
Cr. Com
Hour of Commons
John Wheble
City of London
Wheble
Fursmons
John Wheele
House’ of Commons
Eye
Weble
Seaker
House
Commons
Court of Justice
Hill
Courts of Justice
Whebler
Lincoln's Ln
Also Mentioned on This Page
Frerener
House'of Commons
Cvas
Tacitus
Thomas Gordon
Efy
F. Rivington
L. Davis
Hawes
Clarke
Collins
W. Johnston
T. Cadeh
J. Dodsley
T. Becket
Richardson
Archibald Bowery Efe
Rome
J. Walter
Charingscrafs
Walker
Ipaxen
aRanes Lave
Aes
Zara
T. Carnan
St. Paul' S Church-yard
Telemachus
Ulysses
Cambray
Brotherton
Sewell
Cornhill
I. R. Blatir
Saveour
Waterland
Tobias Coytes
Stratford Upon Avon
Tillotson
Earl of Shrewsbury
Price
Oliver Cromwell
Britain
Matthew Decker
Langham
G. Camdenus Ilustratus
Count Daneis
Madam Gomez
Dorset
London
Baier
British Museum
John Hutchins
AL Rettor
Holy Trinity
Wareham
Swyre
J. Hiiton
King’s Arms
Paternofters Row
Warwick-lant
Wars Stackhouse
Jesus Christ
Wickfired
John Hinton
Paternofler
Ness Warwick-Lane
Great Britain and Ireland
Ottawa
Church of England
Mane
Edwall Wicktredd
Paternoster Row
Warwick-Lane
Great-Britain
Ireland
Rackingheam
Arthur Young
Ef. Authey
Pall-Mall
Manchester
John Whitaker
B. D
F. S.A
C. C. C. Oxford
Dodsley
White and Lowndes
Fleet-ftrest
Payne
Mews-gate
Cadel
Strand
Davis
Holborn
Baker and Leigh
York-freet
Covent= Garden
Brotherton and Sewell
Cornwall
Parker
Oxford
Merrills
Cambridge
Newton, Clarke
Harrop