The Canal Plan and Rural Reform Debated in Late 18th Century Text
The narrator criticizes proposed canal projects and turnpike roads across four counties noting adverse effects on farmers, labor, and settlement. He contrasts wartime mobilization with costs of inland improvements, laments neglect of uncultivated land, and discusses canal machinery, land lifting, and potential drainage benefits versus immense expense and disruption to rural life. The piece weaves in observations on agriculture, wages, and the broader economy amid political and social commentary.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Wagner
S.pean
Taydelf
Goodsater
Gdoti
Cornwall
Redruth
Coluimbe
John Edgocan
St. Austell
Clift
Wwébtich
Hyde Hefpeetey
Ike
Also Mentioned on This Page
Adelp AL Lottery
Mes
Srighardson and Goodluck
Lowery
Whitehall
Conthill
Eighich
Eure Lee
Ansell Anay
Riling Genesaon
Sage Ards Fuafive
Coxipany
Uth
Fe Dodpridge
F. Bucklagd
Greahanys
Lane
Rivington
Hawes
Clark Ard Collins
W. John
An Ee T
Micoll
G.robinton
Baldswin
Omidge
Ing
Wiheie
Hail
Emily Bypotitor
Ana’ Dthen
Sara Ee
Ana
Seelbitiey
Divisié
Tirer
Vannes
Lee Streety
Paul
Sane Nett
Righardson
Uiggahart
Roy
Joep
Hees Merrill
CamBridge
White
Fleer
J. Wilkie
Robert Walpole
Hoble
Egerborough
The
GantTiauen
Constry
Soueerser
Devousssne
Comnwall
Io Ski
Hovin Flanders
Péror
Morgoth
Leghorn
Dee
Cadiz
Vera-Cniax
Ash Onetallbeld
Pliciey
Theissczule
Changgligr
Fiedady Yao
John Weir
Dominica
Stamford
Stokes
Doddington
Atoles R
Gretton Mills
Gedd’ Hope
Amterdam
Leith
Garrick
Harihy
Giri
Lars
Cha
Newgate
Coxente Garnen
Henry
WaMary