Debates on Falkland’s island rights and national honour
Continuation of the Debates on a proposed Address of Thanks for the Spanish Convention. Col Barre and others condemn the treaty as a humiliation, arguing Britain forfeits Falkland’s island and South Seas navigation. Critics demand full disclosure of papers, warn of war, and condemn ministry for perfidy and lack of readiness.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Olonel Beee
J Tonfels
Bucarelli
Spain
Falkland
Tom Hic Majesy
Falkland’s Island
Pope Alexander the Sixth
South Seas
England
Queen Elizabeth
F Nnay
Raleigh
Seid
Charles the Second
James the Second
Duke of Bedford
France
Galden
Compa
Howe
Mediterranean
Europe
America
Douglas
Howie
Wolfe
Pocock
Keppel
Great Britain
N-cu-us-n C
Col. Barre
Alexander the Sixth
Alexander
Sik
Prince Mafferano
Gibraltar
Jamaica
Prmest
Admiralty
Tahem
Gut
G—Roeg
de Hause
Colman
House of Commons
Epm-xp
Falkland’s
Mabon
Port Egmont
Manilla
C-nw-y
D-nn-xe
D-nn-ng
S Peak
Danng
Col
Bry
Gsorge
Wibire Ells
The Opposition’s Threat to a Baronet’s Lands
A speaker condemns the opposition for pushing to deprive a northern baronet of much land, arguing such injustice cannot be justified by party aims. He warns that even if opposition drives a drastic measure, it would misuse power and threaten constitutional integrity.
Also Mentioned on This Page
James Duchal i
W. Johofson
Lodgateeftreer
May Co