Debate on Massachusetts Bay civil government reform
Lord North moves to regulate Massachusetts Bay governance, proposing to strip democratic power from the Assembly and empower the Governor as a civil magistrate with wide appointment powers. Critics warn such changes threaten liberty, probe Council and jury roles, and call for caution while seeking order and obedience to law.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ne Rox
Massachusetts Bay
L Ord N Tu
Supreme Court
Boston
Province of
Massachusetts' Bay
Eng
Fletcher
Assembly
N~sharpfe
Stephen Fx
Gover
G. G
America
Council
House of Lords
Court of Chancery
Reframed Massachusetts Bay Bill Passage Granted
The text notes that the Americans were described as conscientious and peaceable, with no opposition to bringing in the Massachusetts Bay bill. It emphasizes a belief in a respectable people under his Majesty’s dominions and the leave given to proceed with the bill.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Vienna
Constantinople
Black Sea
Rufsian
Kinsbergen
Kilia
Feluccas
Pont Euxine
Hara Degnizi
Count Romanzow
Turkey
Foros
Cape Eméné
Bourgas
Europe
Feragho
Mahomet
Crimea
Bosphorus
His Majesty
Massachusetts Bay
Acob Hemet
Her
Princesa Amelia
Hemet
W. Bayley
Cockspur-stree
Haymarket
J. Price
Leadenhail-street
London
M. Purdie
Bath
Also Mentioned on This Page
Lord North
Philip Dormer Stanhope
Lars of
Cheserfield
Piainse Stannorg
Dresden
Eucenra Stannerg
J. Dodsley
Pall-mall
Osaco
Gunter
James Ferguson
F.R.S
W. Strahan
T. Cadel
Mr. Fergusn
Siraac Newton
Doddridge
Royal Paper
Sos
Philip Henry
Ur. Doddridge
Noah
S. Thomas
G. Robinson
T. Slack
Newcastle
J. Wright