Jam fraud case ends in acquittal for defendant Knight
Vincent E Knight was acquitted after a defense contending the evidence failed to prove possession of raspberry jam intended to be stolen. The trial heard that mislaid deliveries and dubious testimony by co‑accused Forbes cast serious doubt on the Crown’s case. Jurors heard how jam shipments from Wright Heaton Co and Meagher’s Co were involved and how a second charge was dismissed with disposal of goods left undecided by the court.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Meaghers
Knight
Meagher
Vince Knight
Alrady
Suger
J Knight
Price
Lam Merte Knight
Brim Io
Giane
Willbe
Tme
White End Alwil
Meagher and Co
Meagher Wrd Co
Fins
Aymar
Meillen
Mimurder
Knight Fist
Brentwood
Alfred James Walker
Accouuts
Jones & Co
Jam Manuffacturers
Rydney
Wright, Heaton & Co
Forbes
Witnew
Hobart
Mullen
Reginald Strickland
Forfae
Defendant
O.K
Meilion
Ix-L
C.M. Jem
A. J Meagher
Frm
John Meagher & Co. Pty. Ltd
Forties
Leste Fortes
Bis Fixtures
Bute
Winson
Jones and Co
WLM
Melilon
Saco
AE Tooth
Wright, Heaton and Co. Ferber
Wright, Heaton de
Mr. Melllon
Tom Jones & CO
James Vivien
John Meagher
Defendent
Jomes Knight
Proceutiers
Mor
Simona
Iron Wright, Heaton & Co
HetueTn
Lal
Meillon
Cain
P.M
Vincent Edward Chas
Johnson Street
Leslie William Forbes
Apri Ial
Monty
Constable Rains
PLM
Mell Jon
Seimpeion
Mr. Meillam
Rains
Ninel da
Also Mentioned on This Page
Mark Venables
Delco-Remy
Weidenhoff Tester
Hillman, Humber and
Hupmobile
Diamond T. Trucks
Rankin Street
Vanderfield & Reid Ltd
Rustef
Soneneeen
Thoustee
OEY
Ellnabeth Street
Cannereagh Savings Bank Street
Sydney
Dowling
Vincent E. Knight
Australia
RADIO
Aison & CO
Golden
Grace Moore
LUX
Aya
Shin
Neng
Om Ie
Evoland
America
Hollywood