Prohibition debate and U S A alcohol policy compared
A historical critique argues for Prohibition, citing U S A data on convictions, unemployment, and revenue. It cites Judge Geminel, clergy, and Archbishop Ray, claiming alcohol harms employment and economy while Prohibition reduces crime and taxes. It discusses New South Wales figures on compensation, licensed venues, and government revenue under Prohibition.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Alame
Janary
Sentral
Sydney
Detroit
U.S.A
Geminel
Chicago
USA
Vietima
Holsted Clerg
Yellow Press
U.5a
P. E. Ray
Canada
Ottawa
New South Wales
Value and worth in society oppose liquor production
The author argues real value drives economic wealth and that alcohol serves no essential life need. He claims booze wastes resources, harms physical and mental health, and that workers in the industry should be retrained or pensioned to reduce societal burden without financial loss, promising mental enrichment instead.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Fon
Sutherland
Newcastle
Lana
Hugh H. Sutherland
Also Mentioned on This Page
USSA
Martha Beasley Bruore
National Federation of Settlements
State
National Welfare Societie
de Answ
Robert B
N.S.W
Anthony Hordeans
America
Committee OF the
U.S. Senate
Labor
Ala
Arthur Rae
Daily Press
Mary Glimour
Simon Hickey
M.lg
Geo
Burns
Mahl
Mlawarray
Vo Winstaning
Queenalend
Labour
Hen
W. F Finlayson
Exlabour Mha
Brisbane
Australia
Slao