Indian war debate and cabinet papers clash in Lords
The Lords debate India policy with Lord Portchesters motion to lay dispatches before Parliament. Lord Grenville, Duke of Montrose, and others defend government secrecy while treating the war as just. A subsequent motion for Bengal Minutes passes. the House adjourns after a lengthy political exchange.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Lord Portchefer
Colonel Floyd
India
Col. Floyd
Duke of Montroe
Ele
Tippoo Sultan
Portebeffer
Board of Control
Mangalore
Travancore
Wanrore
Portelsier
Chincillor
Jvortrofe
Lord Porchester
Feady
Lord Calice
Lord Grenville
Storment
Abiderave
Thurlow
Stormont
Leazhborough
Pitchester
Grenville
Europe
Rafia
Lord Stormont
Crimea
Lord Loighborough
Lord Portchester
Bengal
Commons
Conviction of Felons Bills and Financial Measures Debate
The Lords discussed reward distribution for felons, conflicting with royal prerogative to spend public money, and agreed to defer the matter for three months. A separate Lords committee examined Clerks of Office and further debated Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes, outlining stamp duties and reissue rules. The House then moved to Ways and Means for naval and colonial expenditures, including Navy ordinary rates and ships funding, with an adjournment after Sierra Leona Bill postponement.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Bromyard
Bowes Road
Mersey Navigation
Dudley
Lewes Market
Aylesbury Road
Ellesmere Poor
Spondon
Speaker
Commons
House
Rolls
Powys
Harrison
Burden
Burke
Master of the Rolls
Lord Beauchamp
Fodrell
Douglas
Ddoéart
Ile
Rcol
Benjamin Hammett
Hawkins Brown
Pit
Committee of Ways and Means
Bank of England
Hobart
Hopéns
Corps of Artillery
New South Wales
Crang Hancock Piano Fortes Open for Public Trial at Westminster
Royal patent instruments by Crang Hancock, piano fortes with spring key touch, harp and flutes, offered at 16 to 106 guineas. Warehouse at No 32 Parliament Street, Westminster, opened for free viewing on all days except Sundays. Credit sales or hire arrangements are not available.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Crang Hancock
Parliament-street
Westminster
Hancock
Criminal Information Rule Granted in King's Bench Case
Law report from Westminster Hall on Friday May 13 describes a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be exhibited against Mr Jorkin M P. The case recalls a prior rule against Mr Joliffe instigated by Mr Fenshaw, resolved as absolute after Joliffe circulated hand bills claiming improper motives in the prosecution. The court, noting Joliffe's defence of his conduct, refused the information and urged a fresh application, leading to a renewed rule for Mr Fenshaw.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Fx@ine
Jorkin
M. P
Court of King’s Bench
Fenshaw
Joliffe
Kingston
Justice Goutp
Jouite
Br. Fen Ian
Nave
Also Mentioned on This Page
House OF Lords
Commission
Canterbury
Erskine
Estine
House OF Coalmons
Sierra Leona
IRON
London
Thames
John Johnson
Pope’s Heat-alley
Carahille Joho J
Bedfordshire
Chantealley
Cornhill
Riseley
Kimbolton
Bedford
St. Neot’s
Messitage
John Rootham
William Pickens
Garraway’s
Kimbarton
Cross Keys
Falcon
Bletsee
George
Mr. Styne
Gray’s Inn
Northamptonshire
Garraway
Ufford
Stamford
Grantham
James Manners
Alford
Wansford
Bell
Stilton
Garrawey's
Stone
Holbhorp-court
Gray’s-inn
Yrondor
Hickorin
Walcot
Robart Rudkin
Norfolk
Gray’s Lin
Law Report
King's Bench
Wistminster Hall