New Lady's Magazine and London Magazine Advertised
An early notice promotes the New Lady's Magazine dedicated to the Princess Royal, priced sixpence, including frontispiece and plates. alongside The London Magazine for January 1791, described as a complete monthly repository with copperplates and extensive letter-press, urging subscribers against higher-priced rivals.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Enera
Caldwall
Sophia
C dc
New Lady’s Magazine
London
Alex. Hogg
King’s Arms
Patermoster
Newcartiers
Great-Britain
France
Ireland
É&C
London Magazine
Gentleman
Spain
Charles “Prince of
Ligné
Gentleman’s
Universal
Lottery Proposal Promises Full Prize Value and Division
The notice promotes a lottery starting drawings on a Wednesday in February, offering full prize value with no drawbacks. It highlights multiple prize denominations including three large prizes, 9 025 two penny prizes, 19 020 blanks, and claims savings on tickets. Tickets sold at HORNSBY and Co No 26 Cornhill are registered at sixpence per number, with stamps and official schemes provided. Business hours are eight in the morning to eight in the evening per Parliament rules.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ghube
Hornsby and Co
Cornhill
A&i
Tighet
N. B
Wenham
Poultry
London
Isi
Usmbard-street
N.B
William Lawrence
Trowbridge
Ren
Turez Hunpnep
Everisa Lottery
Royan Union
BEA
Fuycett
Fomall
Solard Aol
Giao ' Ag
Shergold and Co Royal Union Bank Lottery Schemes
Promoters Shergold and Co advertise lottery schemes at 9 Cockspur Street and Lombard Street inviting investors to buy shares with low upfront costs. They claim decades of experience, substantial prizes, and guaranteed or near guaranteed returns with plans detailing receipts for quarter, eighth, sixteenth shares and immediate deposits, seeking to draw in wary claimants with assertions of integrity.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Guinea
Reval Union -Bang
Lombard-street
Volich
Meffis
Suercoin and Co
Hetle Lofs
Rowan Union Banx
Toll Exemption Case in Court of King's Bench
The Corporation of London sued the Corporation of Lynn over toll exemptions claimed by London by royal grant. The jury awarded damages of one shilling in Common Pleas, a writ of error was argued, and Lord Kenyon voiced that a suit by London for noninjury or generalized toll disputes lacks legal basis and would erode established rights. He urged preserving strict injury-based actions and cautioned against expanding toll challenges beyond direct victims.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Court of Kine’s Bench
Corporation of London
Cdaborac _ TION of
Lynn
Corporation of Lynn
Bar
Court of Common Pleas
Court of King’s Bench
Serjeant le Blanc
Common Pleas
Mayor
London
Agid Kenyon
Court of Justice
Toll
Also Mentioned on This Page
Shergold and Co
Royal Union Bank
Lomparp-Street
Messrs. Taylor and Co’s
Cockspue- Street
Cuarine-Cross
Fleet Street
Margray and Co