Question of cross examination in Queen's trial debated
Debates in the Lords over cross examination in the Queen's case reveal divisions on whether to relax established legal practice, with supporters citing necessity for justice and opponents warning of unsafe precedents. Arguments reference Duchess of Norfolk precedent, lists of witnesses, time and place specifications, and potential delays versus fair defence.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Brotha
Her
Old Bailey
Duke of Norfolk
Daebesa
Whitehall
St. Martin’s
Braoughaus
Atood
Windsor
Fuller
Bergami
Carlarne
Hhat
Thin
Towney
Marocet
Mie
Duchess of Norfolk
Brougham
Durhean
Norfolk
Madge Forster
Quention
Mr. Broutcham
Abe Low
Tha
Milan
Crusa
Thue
Prongeim
Fubo &Ition
Codweil
Thie Rene
Mr. Mroughan
Haying
Cammon
Lords Debate On Counsel Cross Examination and Indulgence
In the House of Lords Lord Liverpool withdraws his motion and seeks to confine cross examination to necessary questions while permitting Queen’s counsel broader access. The Earl Lauderdale and others debate the scope and danger of delaying proceedings. The Lords seek a balanced, discretionary rule to avoid protracted investigations and safeguard judicial propriety.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Jenty
Earl of Liverpool
Lor Erskine
Lord Grenville
Vintibay
Sauriday
Anto
Hur Macreaty
Earl of Lauderdale
High Court of Parliament
Eveniseber
Karl Grey
Majocci
Earl of Harrowby
Lord Harrowby
Earl Donoughmore
Peert
Earl of Roselyn
Countes
Carnarvon
Etenborough
Msece v . B
Brougham
Feo
Hiverty
Rewa Pd
Abe
Liverpool
Meisehard
Warrie FE
Alletof
House OF Lords
Turrday
Aearsy
Lord Kaniskillen
Aylesbury
Marquis of Buckingham
Lord Rivers
Lord Liverpool
Erskine and
Grey
Earl ‘of Liverpool
Counel
Earl of Laudardore
Lord Erskine
Lord Frékine
Adil
Tong
Queen Baal
Earl of Donoughmore
Lord Ellenborough
Earl Bathurst
Fordship
Pope
Frevaeily
Bes
Also Mentioned on This Page
Urea
Nargurpore
Indus
Ewl Grey
Cross Bench
Lord Lauderdale
Colonius
Geskine
Steenuaus
Edward the Third
Ole Grant
Kalvu
Bing - Jend
Crese
Hogee of Lords
Lee
Jord