Lord Portsmouth Lunacy Inquiry Ends With Verdict
The Commission finds Earl of Portsmouth of unsound mind and incapable of managing his affairs after days of testimony on his conduct and marital ties. Doctors dispute his mental state while jurors consider motives and legal definitions, concluding with a formal verdict. The session also covers army estimates and related legal notices.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Portemonth
Adcom
Munro
Trower
Conmtana
Thomas
Portsmouth
Hartfarnshire
Horlamouth
Horlamouth In November. Tsat
Alder
Mlinburgh
Swanson
Lord Grantley
Coombs
Capy
Arivtello
Witnous
Tin
Lordabis
Guardahip
Eacos
Francis Willis
Comaydione Trower
Lord Portsmouth
Vrance
Portsmeonth
Ainslie
Latham
Jones
Mc Coombs
Elis
Edinburgh
Bin
Hank
Witham
Mas A
Bluuilton
Hursthourne
Scotland
France
Wien
Htt
Dortamonth
Lord Portemouth
Adam Wpo
Lord Portsmmouth
Geulamar
Commissioner Trower
Tfo
Cerparte Cranmer
Karlhean
Mrakine
Ex-Parte Cranmer
Wis
Manshaven
Flansoo
Aso
Ax Je
Ringe
Nesven
Jala Fitzroy
Aati
Julio Charles Earl of
Portamounth
Dem
Julbo Charles Bach
Traower
Juns Fettroy
Taawsa
STATE OF THE COUNTRY. Conk, Mincorbo and unrest rise
Reports from Coole and nearby lands detail arrests and detachments as High Constable Flewenn executes an attachment against Mr Horliby of Taitrim. A shooting wounds a laborer of Mr Casey, with assailants jailed under cavalry guard. Fire damage and threats spread through Ballyhay, Ballyhoun Lodge, and Johnstown. Coroner notes and inquests follow a string of violent disturbances across the region.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Coole
Biheroes
Flewenn
Horliby
Taitrim
Casey
Haewson
Tineliby
Casay
Waundaratand
Bridawall
Cuance
Kinarte Cavalry Association
Teard
Rifle Brigade
William Newman
Fisq
Kinsale
Conrcoy
Donovan
Limerick
Newman
Hoard
Francis Milner Barry
F.sq
Ballynagoul
Yonghal
Cahirlog
Barry
Ballyhourn Lodge
Pat
Christopher Crofts
J.sherlock
22D Regiment
Majendie
Ballyhay
Crofts
Velvetstown
Arras
Ma Martin
Jounstay
Wn Martin
Jotnston
Gleuville
Martin
Shine
Ubarky
Cork Chronicle
Court case over letter of introduction and discount fraud
A London Royal Court action concerns Henry Geoghegan and partners facing a dispute over a letter of introduction used to discount Peacock’s bills. The case centers on misrepresentation, alleged authorisation by Geoghegan, and whether the defendants are liable for discounts lacking proper introduction or guarantee.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Court OF King's Bekch
Priday
PRR
Justice Seas
Robert Shaw
Bart. and Co
Yintiffs
Henry Geoghegan
Clarathon
Defeng
Robert Johnston
Phariff
Thia City
Fendant ix
Jacob Geoghegan
Jenry Ghegan
Peacock
le Sacund
Bank
Hoy Groghegan and Co
Fi Mossis Geoghogan
Henry
Liverpool
Mersey Bank
Sir R. Slow and Co
Gentlemey
Dublin
Devenck
John Pensack Co
Jacob Grosmean & Soy
Miaska Street
Ta Rahert Shaw, Bad, and Co
Etc
Pencack Ud
Goold
Roard
Weright
Hanlon
Bart
Ghod
Crimetiton Teagth
Geta
Kanyon
Gil
Also Mentioned on This Page
Lord Porfsmoutis Case
Amy
House of Commons
Pha
India
Hari India Company
Tadia
Pouteria
fTigh Court of Justice
Brussalx
Patoeka
Princess of
Hainault
Prince di Ligne
Louis
Counteus Potucka
Kingdom
The
Netherlands
Tropdon
Swit
Portugal
San Leorengys
Boatlock
Toth
Emilic
Doh
John Lansen
Cation
Isotter
Vladireon
Dou
Rolle
Isle
Sale Bath
Littheport
Cains
Warknroup
Maton
Whiuraday
Andrew Neorio
Tricksmith
Bia
Sy Pond
Tvooralay
Chattia
Usathoe
Demne
Leosiness
Angil
Ter
Binvin bin Alness
Jno Nolen
Shanagollon
Nolan
Beighall
Thomas King
Mugtill
Teluigiog
Khiuudiyan
Toba
Pte
Soyer
Wean
Hodane
Witten Harrett
Bay
Cuthiamare
Adasen
Same Coe
Anne
Didishter
Anthony Cooper
Itch Hill
Aly Met
William Barthowish
Armerion
Britain
Partpatrick
Ireland
Archibald Gibsons
Captain Wilson
Enidérae Bratay
Mary Cee
Luna Watt
Macrae