Indemnifying Bill defended amid ministerial charges
The author argues against indemnity for alleged accomplices in the Earl of Cr's case, challenging pamphleteers who deny criminal acts. Three main charges are outlined: clandestine remittance contracts with Jamaica, abuse of power to undermine parliamentary independence, and collusive warrants transferring public funds to private hands. The piece contends the Bill encourages truthful disclosure without enabling false accusations and cites treasury corruption ties as strong grounds for suspicion.