Conclusion of M de Voilin Speech at Paris Parliament
The speech defends the Arch bishop of Ambrun against attacks from Advocates, notes the Archbishop’s declarations of loyalty, and attacks his principles on the separation of church and secular power. It cites related writings by the Ancient Bishop of Apt and the two other works, urging suppression of such papers and referencing recent legal actions and ecclesiastical matters in Ambrun.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
M. de Voilin
Paris
Ambrun
Ambra
Apt
France
Montpelier
Grenoble
Peter Faure
Ilustrious
Authbishor Paes
I Konbeun
Rue du Palais
Prince
Sieurs Samson
Olivet
Couet
Armis
Gaucher
Fargeau
Orleans
Grenelle
Andrew Faure
Alustrious
Rue de Palais
Marseilles
J. P. Brebion
N. S
Rome
Diac M. Costia
Targa
Cofcia
Venice
Cardinal Banchieri
Strate
M. Stampa
Lyons
Cardinal de Polignac
Prince de Cazerta
Soriano Albani
Chigi
Rafpoli
Evreux
Carignan
Turin
Lewis
M. Pucelle d’ Orgemont
Marshal de Catinat
M. Cremer
Regiment of Foot of
la Mark
Avenes
M. Maffe
Hhis
Scate
Duke de Valentinois
Monaco
Prince of
Versailles
Santi
Mademoiselle de la Houflaye
M. Guinet
M.guinet
Mademoiselle de la Houflayé
Mole de Champlatreux
Also Mentioned on This Page
the Daily Courant
Deal
Benner
Sherwell
Brane
Kingsley
Hamburgh
Esterday
Elizabeth
Jefsop
Barbadoes