Power and Privilege Debate in South Carolina Assembly 1722
A historical notice recalls how the South Carolina Commons House of Assembly in 1722 asserted its privileges amid protests from merchants and citizens. It cites actions against a money bill and petitions, detailing governor and council interactions and the assertion that the House alone could punish petitioners while maintaining established rights. The document frames these proceedings as foundational to colonial constitutional power.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Commons of Assembly
Commons House of Assembly
Nicholson
Charletown
Commons
Hart
William Tunley
Great Britain
General Assembly
House of Commons
Corainiotidist Assembly
Hop. I, Amxands
C.D. Ce
Also Mentioned on This Page
South Carolina
Toft
Wiliam
Tupley, Cler
Col
Fehn Fenwicke
Benjamin Whitaker Elg
James Moore
Lisbon
Fune
Brazil
Don Antonio
Aryatte
Don Carlos
Don Nuno
Dafolva ‘Telles
General Council
the Inquisition
University of
Coimbra
Don John de Megilgea
Guarda
de Angela
Nunes
Mark Gonsalvas de Cruz
Order of the Minimis
St. Francis de Paula
O.oo
Warfin
N.S
France
Cracow
M. Szembeck
Lowitz
M. Szirakowski
Turku
Constantinople