Reply to the Army Invectives and Protect the Nation
A letter defends the current Army against charges of tyranny, arguing a Standing Army differs from an annual one, and that a Parliament-armed force safeguards liberty. It contrasts dangers of permanent power with civil oversight, cites past safety, and notes ongoing European news from France Vienna and Berlin.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Stentor
Adinistry
D’ Anvers
England
D’ Amers
Court de Gent
Offend
D. Prie
Vienna
Count de Harrach
Baron de Waes
Brussels
Frankfort
Jan
Tzeggnito
Bavaria
Broel
Tris
Jar
N.s
Vis
France
Spain
Don Carlos
Italy
Europe
Prince Royal
Lower Rhine
Hague
Crane
Paris
Fon
Parma
Marquis de Biffy
Bourbon
Vifa
Florence
M. Annuiuen
Arne
la Muette
Lis Majetty