Hide Article Text (OCR)
A MASSILLON CASE. Jth« Answer Flt«d iu tb« Suit of Gilbert N.Porter,Canton, April 17.-—Lawyer Wm. Me* i Millao, representing, the defense in the caee of R. A, Pinn against Gilbert N. 4 Porter, Rosanna Porter, and Henry V. and Jennie Kramer, has filed an answering petition. The defendant, Henry Kramer, for his first defense denies lt;that he conspired with Gilbert N. Porter to cheat or defraud the plaintiff or other creditors of the said Porter. He did, nowever, buy a lot frtm Porter for which he paid $1,400, and denies that he holds said property in trust for the benefit of the creditors of Gilbert Porter. At the time of the sale it was agreed that | Porter could secure the property again i by paying $1,400 without interest. Porter then agreed to pay Mr. Kramer $10 rent per month as long as he occupied the property. He has neither paid the ; $1,400, nor the rest, therefore the defendant prays the court to ascertain theamount due and render judgment in theamount against Gilbert N. Porter.
Newspaper Details
Massillon Independent
Massillon, Ohio, US
Mon, Apr 20, 1896
Page 1
Full Page
Clipped by
Massillon P.
OH, USA 17 Jun 2023
Other Publications Near Massillon, Ohio
Massillon Daily Independent
Massillon Item
Massillon News
Massillon Independent
Evening Independent
