Debates on Catholic Emancipation and the Veto in Ireland
A lengthy House discussion critiques domestic nomination and the Veto as security for Protestants. Speakers argue over Catholic clergy influence, Prussia and other states, and the risks of granting civil rights without proper securities. They call for detailed principles and possible concordat with Rome before any committee motion.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Ireland
Halling
Dublin
House of Commions
Synod of Catholic Bishops
Parliament
Sue
Kilkenny
Christendom
Europe
J. O. Uippistey
Baronet
Prussia
Great Britain
Silesia
Prussian
Rome
Game
Cleregyman
Holland
Denmark
Sweden
Tome
Mr. Grattan
Russia
Imeperor
Edinburgh Review
Hympresk
Hessiat
Mohilen
Rlomie
Naples
Ope
Spain
Africa
Hurope
Rone
Vatican
College of Maynooth
Wys
Lame
Poland
Apostolic See
House of Israel
Apostolic Palace
England
É&C
London
Mensber
Lord Castlehaven
Leeland
Viii
Elizabeth
James
The
Boyne
William
Lord Elenborough
Lhere
Mever
Mover
Ireland. Mr. Yorke
Lenach
France
Surjaris
Scotland
Germany
Howards
Cliffords
Arundels
Garriollies
Debhers
Si J. C. Heippisley
M. Foster
Middle District
Lingard
Hog
H. Parnell
Mender
Bengh
Hivfe
J Aw
Allther
Webber
Gentileman
Burke