Debates on abolition treaties and treasury expenses
Members discuss abolition pressure on slave trade as 1840s to 1810s treaties are cited. They debate costs of treasury staff, colonial outlays, and the scope of parliamentary scrutiny, with calls to curb expenses and improve accountability in government offices.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Arpaithhiop
Portugal
Raaseia
Portiaa
Tate An
Joross
Spain
Canerica
Worre
George Coltier
Sierra Cone
Seyi
Cambridge
Wight
Pate
Lushington
Lushington: Shad. Furniishedl Him Mi, Rr Suigeestiont
Rondon
Treasury
Ian the Bey
Hume
Treasury Department
Wandlsoan
Atssidtatt
Gar’ Rison
Calspa
Colonial Office
Maan Otite
Aestosithia
Rivinsdn
Arbuthnot
Sega
Abuthnidt
Harrison
Pitt
Elvets
Hether
Wasia
Berlidmenty
Viesweda
Feder
Mabrier
Fe Elbaney
Gunane
Hinailersiegk
Scbremainy
Home Department
Homey Amist
Japan
He i Bachequer
Ranklin
Waa Ag
Fras
le Lefra
Sei
Pat Liavhentt
Janet Peay
Eae
Cra OU EY
Arhutlnoe
Werdithena
R. Goulburn
Poland
Biles Aston
Japha Henven
Fbf
Rene
Aktraid
Wessel
Tidl Sitibe
Tomas Ahho