Site C debate prompts local reader response
A Coquitlam reader in a Facebook post argues that Site C dam will flood hunting and camping lands used by local cultures. They claim the article praising Site C lacks understanding of impacts on land, elders, and communities near flood zones, urging concern for farmland and landscapes.
Opposition to Site C dam explained in letter to editor
Mr. Taylor argues for Site C while the writer cites environmental damage, loss of farmland, riverbank erosion, and downstream impacts. They criticize high costs and private power subsidies, noting BC Hydro's $6.6 billion estimate, previous BC Utilities Commission warnings, and the 1983 denial, then describe renewed interest and regulatory changes under the Clean Energy Act.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Mike Taylor
Taylor
BC Hydro
Peace Canyon
Alberta
BC Utilities Commission
Globe and Mail
Thank you Chetwynd for lending a hand
The Dempster family thanks Chetwynd residents for hospitality after a July 26 truck breakdown entering the city. They praise Robert's Towing for rapid aid, Chetwynd Glass for allowing overnight parking, and Gear-O-Rama for quick parts from Dawson Creek and swift repairs. They left July 27 impressed by local kindness.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Robert
Chetwynd Glass
Dawson Creek
Chetwynd
Dempster
Run of river power explained as low impact option
A reader argues run of river hydro projects avoid dams and reservoirs, using natural mountain elevation changes and buried penstocks to generate clean electricity with minimal environmental disruption. Construction alters roads briefly, then returns site, leaving a small powerhouse and intake structure. The author questions the environmental concerns raised by opponents.
Also Mentioned on This Page
Site C
Coquitlam
Canada
Fraser
Thompson
Pitt
Alouette