Living wage critique and taxation reform debate
An extended discussion questions the living wage standard favoring family needs over single men, arguing it burdens workers and distorts incentives. It cites judge Hogans, Australian practice, and Crown policy, proposes unified family income pooling for tax, and criticizes political handling while urging direct grants to children.
MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE
Australia
Owen
Tice
Justice Hogans
Marrre
Korthhe
Oal
Theodore
Courier
Also Mentioned on This Page
Mareeba
Tolga
Pere—Vinen
Atherton
Yungaburra
Peeramon
Malanda
Stacey & Stacey
Cairns
Townsville
Clark & CO
A. Villiers
Marconi School of Wit
Wireless
Clarence Street
Sydney
Fimelee Benvsibilitirs
Golder Gasket
Faton Meuse Queen St
Owen Whittick
Newsagent
H. H. Pittard & CO
Abbott Street
TEX _TURNLEY
Babinda
Mehhmod
Justice MecCawley
Sheldon
Tarzalt Hotel
Spence Street
Severin Street
Petre
Sen
Riet Keel
Horrockses
Menza
Nham
AFLA
Aloa Public Accountant, Auditor and ‘General Comminsion Atherton
Lado EN & Son
Amalcamated Independent Films Limited
Etopanie
C. Om
A. Langley Simmons
King and Enmore Alliance
Brisbane
W. P. Mellifont
Gladetone
D. C Graham
Fay
Film Inter
Ward Gaffrey
Queensland War Savings Committee
Tor
Foster
Campbell
Teeuter
Charles Mc Merwan Fay
Pietere
London Bank of Awevala Ltd
Romy Street
Brotane
Messrs
Arthur H. Clarke
ALL Chemists & Stores
New Zealand
A. J. Draper, Ltd
Lake Street