vXlt;?lt;•X-.yand toHOW MUCKLANDEDDETENTIONPreferred Internmentto Trial Involvinga WomanNOT IN PLOT AGAINSTSOLDIERS’ MORALSFaced With Proof ofMann Law ViolationChose PrisonThe Post’s exclusive story yesterday concerning Dr. Karl Muck’s prison life caused widespread discussion about Boston. There hasalways been a great deal of mystery J D _ thrown about the case of Dr. Muck1and this has given rise to a vast crop of sensational rumors concerning thecharges against the. former leader ofthe Symphony Orchestra.The public has had an altogether wrong idea of just what sent Dr.Muck to a detention prison.THE REAL FACTSAYanceHazz;It was not until the episode in Provi- I now dence where either Dr. Muck or th« ' management of the Symphony Orclie-*- j Miss tra refused to put The Star Spangled I Q£ pr Banner on the orchestra programme ’ that Dr. Muck received any attention from the authorities. It was a costly refusal for Mr. Muck, for the incident created a great storm all over the country and resulted in Washington being flooded with demands that something be done about it.The Attorney-General then took a this e hand and sent a sharp and peremptoryleged$5000assets!row of M1 Con tinned on Page 5 SPxtli Col. i disCU5