Hide Article Text (OCR)
FOSTER PARENTS WIN A SUITtlfo 1 Long Legal Battle Ovor Two Children Derat 'oided by tho Supreme Court.The now noted Rcliroeder-Filbert case,whioh has twice been in tho supreme court, was again decided by that court Wednesday. Tiie suit wroa begun by James It. Filbert for possession of bis two little children, who havo for yearslived with Mr and Mrs. Fred Schroe*der at Cedar Creek, Casa county, Mrs, Schroeder being the step-mother of the children’s deceased mother. The opinion handed down yesterday reverses and dismisses the case, thus giving the fosterof theparents undisputed possession children. The story of this suit, which has been repeatedly published, is ono full of sorrow and heartaches for allconcerned, and tho timeworn tilings in the supreme court contain pictures of the two little ones over which there hasleon so much trouble, together with photographs of the home of their foster parents and a big tlouring mill, also owned by tho foster parents.The principals in the case were first beard of when Filbert w’us owner andpublished a little newspaper at Kone-saw, Neb. Criminal intimacy between tho wife and E. N. Crane was chnrgedby Filbert, and with her alleged confession in his possession a separation ensued. Mrs. Filbert went from place to place and iinallv died in a town in Kansas from the result of an operation which she attempted to perforin. The children, Florence A. and Angela C., now woven and six years old respectively, were separated, but were finally ikon care of by Mr. and Mrs.Schroeder,where they have lived ever since very contentedly.The father soon attempted to get them under his care and Judge Chapman entertained a haboas corpus case, transferring the children to tho father at such time as he might be able to show that he could properly maintain them. Recently Filbert appeared in Cass county and made a showing, claiming that ho had married again, was practicing Jaw in Indiana and was abundantly able tomaiutnin and educate the children. Thewrit of habeas corpus was granted and the childred ordered transferred to thefather.Judge Ambrose then hearing the case, issued the decree so that a stay of ten days was granted, and the foster parents immediately took, the case to thethe childrensupreme court on error, never leaving the home of the aged couple. The syllabus of the opinion rendered yesterday is as follows:Schroeder et al. vs. .State ex rel. Filbert. Error from Cass countv. Re-Error from Cass county, versod and dismissed,Opinion by Commissioner Ragan.In a controversy for the custody of an infant of tender years the court will considor the best interests of the childand will make such order for its custody as will be for its welfare without reference to the wushes of tho parties. Sturtevant et al. vs. State, etc., 13 Neb., 439; Giles vs. Giles, 80 Neb., 624; State ex rel. vs. Schroeder, 57 Northwestern Reporter, 307, approved and followed.2. The right to the custody of an infant child which the law confers upon its father is not for tho benefit of thofather, but for the benefit of the child; and this right of custody is conferred on the father, because the law presumes that he will avail himself of the child’scustody for its benefit; but ho may forfeit his right to the custody of the child by abandonment.Decision* of tho C ourt.
Newspaper Details
Lincoln Semi Weekly State Journal
Lincoln, Nebraska, US
Fri, Sep 21, 1894
Page 6
Full Page
Clipped by
Anonymous
MT, USA 25 Apr 2022
Other Publications Near Lincoln, Nebraska
Lincoln Evening Journal
Lincoln Daily Star
Lincoln Daily News
Lincoln Star
Lincoln Nebraska State Journal
