Article clipped from Lexington Kentucky Gazette and General Advertiser

1 nouns's ably int wri-“ When ated, o: enfe, and ;rv difFe might it , nouns, number; ence has inquility Thedif-at very to the , to con-nc, how-es of difan -xii •ftrafied. From tin fample whi *Kven of the/ o r k, 1 wouldhive'aheadnrcuin.e no judicious par w!:hhis fon to load his memory with fult; htralh—*-For, as the luge nf Mon-crcello has judlv obferved, “ Igno-rance is preferable to error ; and he is lefs re.not ' ffbiy the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrojig.”.“ Some books,” fat s fir Francis Bacon, “ are to be tailed, others to be fwallowed, and tome few to be chewed and digelled.” Now, courteous readet, 1 think I have fuffici-emly proved, that this little book, called “ Th* American Grammar,’' is to be ranked in the number ofWfe. jthofe that are only to be tailed, forif fwallowed, it might peradventure, .like the little book mentioned in theive eon-jApocalypfe, occafion trdttblefnme /erb may!coinmat,°ns in the inward parts.to each! If the rev. author of the American as in the! Grammar has the candor to acknow-lonv and ledge the j.ritice of tlicfe ftriclures, s dilcord'he will reply in the language of the the con- .']Prn°rtal Buffon “ j’.aime au^nt une appiica- perionnequi mereleve d’une err^ur, on would fiu une autre qui nFapprend *in%as to Mr. Breckinridge; and what is ftrongly evidential of a blind aral (to lore pro- veritte, parce citFen effet une erreur ^ thc h to de«d Mr- B* y»uis where corrigee ell une veritie.” But if, Aei°c*x h“ in e;,te frora what m'ttie y. - c u V. r r fi-n-f', ?! it S« Cr ■id:. ij. s.o i.r.ij. u.ti M. bee4tor it not on.) ha* m.ei uity, but talents* t« ui -n eminent i;r *,r. e v*. it Fed, in dt-’pubi llrnyiiig the chai ac'.vroJ .diuun ; whicii been , B. expelled of coarfe zens to be confiJer~d the next ina.. upon the I.ft for vice prrtid nc. What you ex- d/fi.-ct.-d to gain by your attempt to Verve ^o\lr. B. I cannot t..y, 1101 am I prepared wjt|, to calculate the amount of credit Mr. aL,t!, B- has placed to your account, for your they good intention towards him. In your fervent zeal to ltive him, you loft that circunifpeftion which was abfolutely ne-cclfary to keep out of view the evidences which would go t» convift him, you hate .n rordingly in your defence, exhibitteJ circumftances which bear hard upon hi t , |1U5b and tend much to aggravate the diftieul- Fir ft ties that before furrounded=him ; bu*.. fhip this is not all ; you have not only con-jperfi fiderably encreafed Mr. Breckinridge’s' Ap,. embariaffment, but you have drawn ^*or d uni the fulpieions of the people upon wtlic yourfrlf, as being an advocate of th«i'rue R-publican under his banner.You have written very fedluglv cniby a character, but appear to forgetsthat-it is;felf r. wSdhere corrigee pplied to or* lBe contrary, the talk fiionld be make ufe confidered as invidious, and I iliould a, which be fo unfortunate ac tb become the vefb to objedl of his difpleai'urej fl’iould he ngt£rms “ wax wroth and his anger be kin preferve died againlt rtie,” I have only to fay Copula- ’ the words of the philcfopher, mhliorts, “ Amicus Plato, sed majis arnica Ve-ife, con- ritas.”1 wo or typographical Errors ■'n the first, ■ a copu- D ?0- °f Ari.tarchus.L i Item. ., tnr nomnativ? read n'omiva-rr . five. Rem. 4, for Elipsis read Ellipsis. er’ ” Rem. 5, far wok read, whole. 'Rem. 4, for ingenius read ingenious.o be the better part of his previoualo -dintt That kind of rjafoning is by no .i e.ms conclufive, becaufe it would in' c\Macci.-'y man virtuous who had ever done a rood *£t It is of importance frjyou to “■the chi bottom culpatiipateFor thc Kentucky Gazette. Mr. F. L. Turner.If a no. or under-e and the its com. objectivee abfurdi-umber ellimdiiy es, that! numera-J i copula-j a plural.SIR ar to be, THE opennefs with which you i, which;'iave appeared in the defence of John gant andjBrecklniullt;e' againft the charges exhi-■ bitted by Dan. Bradford, warrants me in addreffinp- to you a few oblervations, not only- with a view ox fliowing the in-conclufivcn. f’s of your attempt to rel’f cue Mr. B-eckmridge from the iinpu tation ot ^,u.l 9 but uiio t'j pomt ou from your own ftatemcius, aided by feme cireuinftancco which have already tranfpired, the fulpieions wnich necetfa rily attach themfelves to y-.u, as an abet. Rr of the principles in the “ True R 1 pnblican,” You hat e informed us, that you were prefent when Mr. Breckinridge received Mr. Magvuder’s letter cp itaining a development of the prin ciples and tendency of the T*.u* R. publican ; you have further infi*n^ u#, .hat jou were apprifed of its?cift\cr before that period, and havejjrovrn by certificates, that piece to have been of confiderable notoriety anrnrft M Breckinridge’s mofl mtimate°frieink fome time before its publitatfbn, am yet you fay, that not a finglt fentenc efcaped Mr. B. to ypu on the fubjeif nor from you to Kim ; notwuhflanJin; the frequent; free, and unrcfervrd con. verfations, which you and Mr. Breckinridge were in the habit of havtflu, iipoiSIR,s exam ■y) comes verb, and objq^kiv-L.. lays, in which run ttfkis infantryun exalts, ind whose fccordin whom fu See.t is heard embolden ok is i “He ated.” In role is it ? nind fee.' 'soever hr the nomi t thejob-tomsoiy i cv*(l, t.he (five cafe id of mr. ig word, iatred is L’s ml. Ye Citi-you if ye r sace! rife up in he earache earth « but be-0*t on is‘ A verb n the in-whether rut a fin-'ollowingIce s and there 'are:1s*t, refine, terline.’' Swift. follow 11 in the de rule ! er,” and l of fci-die prelent political affairs. I you, be espSfiuM?fir, how this lilence is to Was it becaufe Mr. B. frit the fame motives of delicacy which, prevent-ci him obeying the nomination of the republican members of Congrefs, to earn into rfFciff,their vote in favour of M Clinton ? Was it the fame delicacy tha't prevented’ him from attending thc fecund. caucus, after he bad been left b\ large majority, in the votf s for ti e perfon who fbould be runmericarf ants,but materi-had the :m toge-lor pati-through niateni-tfly con-ice prefident, at the enfuing election ? Bqt fir, why were you equally lilent ? Were you afraid ol wounding the delicacy of Mr.B’s feelings, by declaring to him’win, had been done, and its effeiSts upon the publick mind? If you were really a friend to the election of Mr. Clinton, and knew Mr. Breckinridge to be I, too, there would have-been none of that fcniibility between you both, Abe excited by introducing the .'rult;V\~-publican as a topic of converfarion, J\a deprecating it( fentiriients in your free and unreserved conversations. Whet; wu recollect the conduit you advifed 55 e-venfou to purl'ue with Daniel Bradford, for expoling him as the profrffed author af the True Republican, and your vol-' unteer toaft on the I2rh of May (vix.)John Breckinridge, our ienator in congrefs—virtue—patriotism,”*and the one hich you refuted to repeat on the 4th of July, (viz.J “ George Clinton, the tried patriot of T6, and our iicxt vie -prefident—may he De ever preferred to mufhrooms of the day,” we are much ,tufted in entering into yoiir feelings on the difpofi’.io i uf (lie people refijFit-ingthe True Republicaf, and vouY fear of interrupting j\lr. B’s repofe,' by, mentioning it. Mr. H. Harrilbn informs us of a pauipUlet which Capt. Ste\n-!X1 *• 1 fon wilhed him to read, in confirmation i Cl s vice} “Inother i forms ; nity,cBeI.es 1■f Mr. B’s fuperiority to Clirprefident. That pamphlet was writtenUSin vindication lt;-t A. Burr, and for the F” deftrufliori of Clinton and others. It BoTnS° is ftrongly 1'ufpeCled that pamphlet res- r‘r’,Tiil ched Capt. Stevenfon by the friendly ttuihv.c afiiftance of Mr. R. i'his inference is that h.
Newspaper Details

Lexington Kentucky Gazette and General Advertiser

Lexington, Kentucky, US

Tue, Sep 11, 1804

Page 2

Full Page
Clipped by
Profile Icon
Anonymous

USA 18 May 2025

Other Publications Near Lexington, Kentucky

Lexington Morning Herald

Lexington Morning Democrat

Lexington Messenger

Lexington Blue Grass Blade

Lexington Farmers Home Journal