Hide Article Text (OCR)
MORE MATRIMONIAL MISHAPS^The Husband, the Wife and the Former Lover.THE FORMER LOVER S PRESENT LIBERALITY.Mrs. Pauli's ''Solicitor FricodvOntrageoai AcHbo Against • Husband.,YlrAn!=tance ofare tome xpry peculiar house* in .n this vale of leuri Not long o n wife living with her husband ■ *» Ih shocked uni 1 grieved when a M»-itrate refused to (nake an order innf hur lover for the nifport rtf • i Oitdren whom she alleged ebe badtadUV THE SAID LOVER So. apparently, »w the husband, who euro that the children worn lover's, and strongly supported hm i * application. In the csj«* that we nlt;'» about to ileal with, circumstanced rtiSe.red considerably from those hu sj*o just mentioned. yet the case had it* disagreeable preuliaritiea—|rcu-of-o of niic ol the principal charac-i in /.old1. Money bu .-ami 1.DII before Mr Wilshlnj In Summon* Division of the Central rolUu Court last Wednesday. Mary Mabel I’aoll summoned Joseph Pauli, huubtuid,FOR WIFE DESERTIONI Theevidence showed that Josrphl'auU u Liillectur employed by the Singer ,i g Mm; In no Company lie received In* company a wage of £i! lUa a IIwin. however, wan in re-lepan£3Wee*, wiilch she received from hv ahum uho had had. prior to her n ar*i.f,«i. nn illegitimate child It Is,perhaps not surpriding ihal there woa not i.ompieui dooms tic lellcity in abouaehold id a Inch theWIFE was THE PENSIONER of a man who ■«' not her husband— i- the had had a child liy• If thatIn- louU not prevent hur fi'om going oi-ferol lo citriy tho baby to thlt; 'hue for I.ni Slit mused to let htui do no. but • lie afterwards called him n d.rty mr ' )or not having carried the ba* Wtt-iie-s would swear that he «»'«• her Ih whole of hi* earning:- Her own lunttir -he spent on heriiulf Sim would Co iw ur three time* a wnek to have hi- hm ilr«»cil This would tost her 3« . i.clime Witness had photograph* id.wi men hut did not tell his wile ho »m i lovy wiili anv of them. Witness did no llnralcn thatTHE NAME OF T1IE MAN from whom his wife *«. getting £2 week would come out In court hut «,1 new* had in In* posw-Mon a inter frmiV Voniaitue liked (Mr Montague, who hail been rro«*-**aninmg wiUikss evidently did not like. I!« senmod sorry Iki had spoken, and rxpres-ed tho opin.mi ibat Ui« matter had gone far enough Hi* Worship also thought Uiat tho letter need not be resd sr.d so the wiucaa* refrained from reading it.Miss raull. sister of 'he defendant cbill that on the *Jnd It'rtoiil «ha could hear Mrs Pauli speakingIN AN ANOUY VOICE.Then witn**s heard her «ci*am. u which witness pot up anil saw brother holding Mrs Pauli '■ prevent her from ging out She appeared Toavu had some dr.r.k ar.il turned to ■ it ness and asked her whul suit i ;Mm I'aufli Wat being assaulted Wit-*ms brother «u always very kind | ut, a* soon as he • amn into the house. Mr- Paul! seemed to get had tempered When witness wont out •! her room To M-e wluit. w«.s tho matter. Mrs. I’oull wan hilling her hu*lmnd ShaTORE If IS PYJAMA COAT.| and u.-ed very had language lo him Her ' hum was billingI Mm. Holme-, a neighbor aid thn: she raw Mr* l'uull on the 2nd ln»t | with a (deeding no** Her main er I-witura* to tliink thnl -hi hud lien ilnnking .Mr Pauli na.d that hi « . hart liei-n drinking, and that lie had I., .u trying to toko t'o whisky hot Me iron her Mr- PaUll called hur husband a I i ur. andI USED VERY STRONG LANGUAGE | to him Witness waa much «urpru*d ai the RCM1B. bwuuwj .Mrs Paul) had nlwuy taid that tier husband wn» very kind Witness thought tbot They very Ihappy. Wituo* had known defendant 1 wn vean and a hall, and he did not appear to have a viole His Worship *a»«! ih of eonsiructiv* doiertinn the Pourt had to ho antlefled thut tho w.le ju*U-lie.l In leaving her home A doctor's cerllhcnto hud been produced showing ibat fibsHAD BEEN MEDICALLY TREATED for the Injury referred i«r and a number of persons hud given •» idcinv Nome . lire witness**. thought Thai dr had been drinking, but none raid that they had witnessed any assault, If -•* I eroded again .t her huaband fortheaaThea..uldTneiport. Thepay*attractivelytire -«•(. »i il-ui*l!.nercd Wun.au She was ri'pre erited l*y ilr Montague, and her I hi-.bard an- defended by Ml Osborn* She mud that uu October 2 chu ainvud at her hum between Hi and 15 imuute* p.is-. midnight 11m huaband aaul to herivftl. It !» very late totilled a run viet ionsuitable npprohanalor longer to thperson of Mr*. Pauli, and -he wna. there fore, not Ju* tilled in leaving her home she M-emed a nervou- hy»u*ncal person lie i bu Worship) «lisuul»*lt;*d the caseShetha 'ha1 TOR I III END*!I. and co lie ht er sixpwnn urlh)N.her 1‘yea VV.tn*s» then br-.ke the window and tried out for help Mr Bobb, one jjB id the neighbors, demiu.ilcd that ibo ily door be opon«d ami Mr Holmes, on-,.4 other r.elghbor, Jumped over the hack fence and rushed in to witness’ nasle'-at ouco Witiinsa loft lhe premises tha1 ■a evening, and feared to return. She Would ay not gu back becausa *hs waa aJraud ol er hi in*r To Mr O homo DeJorw my marr.ag-^ to delendant Lo 1 HAD AN ILLEOITUIATK CHILD The father of Hie child i* allowing nn-lo C'J u week I am nervous, hut I an, no: io hysterical. My huaband ha* always been ! cruel lo me nhout my little girl, lie I* a vlolvnt-teinpored man. and I am alrmd I to go hack to him I told him about . ihe illegitimate child about three mouths before my marriage to Mm Mra Love. Mr Holmes, and Mr flul.b gave eviderco In partial corroboration of Mr* Pauli * evidence. Mr Moline* j(b nw her on the 2nd ln.-tant with he. nuae bleeding Mr lluhb admittod thut he aniolt apirim on her For tho defence, tho defendant. Joseph Pauli, gave evidence He .aid that at’ did on the occasion referred to wa. lo try and take the spirit bottle from Lit—for her own good Kno had been wa DRUNK ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS.( both before and after the blrtb of their nUI ' i InJel On one occaafou she, whan drunk. u*v i-rohe ornaments, picture-, and other things in tho plncr She afiorward* said P lhal a he was very sorry for having I lv hrokin ihn ornament.s W ine** earned li»: | about £2 10s a week, and gave In* wife every penny of it. If he wanted money Ibe I Wi,h which to buy a plug of tobacco, ho h., B»kei| her for It Sho had taken all the [»r. I iiirmlure out or hie house excefit a th* ' -Irelcliur The furniture wa* his. Nome of II hod been bought on tirne-pay/nent. ■Hid th»L witness Was liable for tin Friday mllowing the night on which WITNESS' WIFE LEFT I he house. wit nose, on rolurniog to his home, louml the link* of tho house broken and his wife in the house. He u*keil her why the lock* had been broken, and told her that It wa» not nacessary to break opm the place. On the next day (Setunlay) he found that all tho lurniiure had been irmn.cd from the hou«c Shu left behind her unpaid I. ill* lo the amount of £Hlt;* Witness had of-fi-red to take hack hi* will lie hod navur threatenedTO CUT THE THRU AT o' one of tlJr children On mdy one occasion had his wife been vit *t hums at flight Witness was vtdl willing toby
Newspaper Details
Sydney Truth
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Sun, Oct 19, 1902
Page 3
Full Page
Clipped by
Anonymous
AU 02 Aug 2023
Other Publications Near Sydney, New South Wales
Sydney Society
Sydney Smiths Weekly
Sydney Saturday Referee and the Arrow
Sydney Party Builder
Sydney Party
