J.iml Srir I)!riM.i — In the Superior • «jrt ytalerday, (Judge .Ntur* r.) ltieca*C »* »r^ e While »•. M. D Puller Si Co., wu» radcd in firur »l ihr defendant#. In aauary, 1S34. the Commercial published a rport that plaint iff had failed, which rep ri j 'v* i I • he iiieorrecl, .mid v* a- mri'rad «i-d ? the Commercial', but plaint .IT eontemJed h«i hi* bu«mm« »u injured, and In* failure, hirh occurred nine month* th-reatlor, ia» rauaed by that report. lt;n th- |,rf °* he defence il wa* allow n that I* • re »rl a» current, hen* and in New York. b. lure ta public ilion; that the pubhcatiou tar a* not nibriuu* one. d'sc, and il a!*« appeared hat plaintiIf * ilcbt' were increased largely •*t»cen the date of the report ot hi’ hn ore nd that of hia actual failure, and it there-1 ore full.iwed that hie credit could not hare hfn njnred by the publication Tin* jury rendered a verdict lor the d!end*nU.— f*a f/«t.• • •