arol lodge Major.,at°| The following card, presented to ui for in-1 publication, we believe, expresses the sen-J® lt;timenta and feelings of the entire body offa our citizens in attendance upon the Circuit Court here, as well as those whose names en; ore signed to it. Judge Major has furn-liis ; ish»d unmistakable evidence of capacity and fitness, in every way, for the station,—the best possible recommendation—and we are|,e i satisfied that nothing but a reckless deter-the- mination on the part of a majority in the the . District to wnive every other consideration tba iR *avor “t*,e P«rty,” Can *his defeat:A CARD.The undersigned who have served as regular jurors, during the present term of the j Hendribks Circuit Court, in view of the ap-the . proackiiig election for Judge, take pleasure ^®-jin testifying to the unexceptionable and na gentlemanly course of Hon. Stephen Ma-■ue jdr; Judge of said dourt. He has evinced ^. in his inatriiUtioMs to us on all occasions, n [ns clearness of Understanding of the law, and fjk; a perspicuity of style id conveying it to us, fto' that have left us nothing further to desire, ih i tn these instructions, bounsel have aniform-{jy corihlifred^ without reference to what may 1 have been the result o’f the? cause In whichj they were givpn, thup ijiahifestipg tfieir appreciation bf his. nigh legal httainmenta.—Under his Experienced arid industrious su-, perVision an extraordinary amount of highly important business lias been dispatched 'during the term.j In. view of his qualifications as a lawyer,! a'nd his high moral worth as a man, wec^j take pleasure in commending him to the fa-^•jvorable regard of his fellow-citizens, without distinction of party. ., ,9 T Benton, ^ Wm M Denwiddfie,' Isaac H Wobcfrow, Jjesse Thompson,C ypaugh/ John C Gambold,j W ajltef ,* Asa Ballard,Levi Smith, CJaleb Harvey,Samuel Clark; Anderson Bryant.*r~i' -» i .*•The Circuit Court adjourns to-day, having dispatched about all the business upon th‘e docket. Quite a number of cases have beeh tried btft, with the exception of three or four, they are not of sufficient genefal interest id entitle them to af .Aotice. ..A li'ofion idr a new trial in the case of Moses Keeney, convicted last week; was argued on Tuesday, and a rehearing granted, on the pleas that two important witnesses had not ^ ; b£e.n introduced, and that one of thejjgrymen^ j had previously expressed an opinion. Bail-----!’ i reputed in! the sum of fifteen hundredd. lars ksWasdol-The next case of any importance was a slander suit—Hodge vs. Newman. Newman charged Hodge with swearing falsely at the last Term of the Circuit Court. The latter brought suit for slander, when the defendant filed a plea of justification, which he sustained before a jury, obtaining judgment for costs.The third was a divorce case — Kennedy vs. Kennedy — the husband suing. In this case — though a separation had taken place for good and sufficient reasons — the application for divorce was made from bad motives, and resulted disastrously, as a consequence, to the p'arty applying. The plaintiff trumpeu up quite a formidable list of charges, and attempted to sustain them by the testimony of Ms bhildfenj but the failure was 6ignal and durfiplete upon each and every item, while the opposite side proV’ed- by many disinterested ^ persons that the defendant was the injured 1 part/—grossly arid mbst iniquirously so — in-juried as: a defenceless wife only can be injured by d't^rnnicar and unmanly husband only.— ” j J3tStf vile fdb'hbdri'a recital of the facts, haying no ^ j desirb that th'e character of the plaiiitiff,•adrevealed ori'this trial, shaft b’e borne by him be-yoiid tiilT circle’ of publicity given it bV the trfaftThe divorce was awarded t'o the defendant, together with $1500 00 alimony.Nave for plaintiff—Gregg And NewcombHarvey, for defendant.David Matlock, jr. vs McClain, Hurin, Wifeo'fi, and others—disturbing a religious assembly—was tried yesterday evening. The it I plaifftiff was arrested at a camp meeting in -y j the’baste'fri-'pat’t'of the conntv, a few weeks h, j since/ oh a’dhar^e of violating the rules, and at ffhed hy Esq. Hurin, on the ground. It rH vfras appealed to this court/and a jury reversed is~ the Magistrate’s decision,anrf awarded $100 isj damages to Matlock. Thb case' will be ta-if- ken' to the Supreme Court.