We cannot consent to reply to Citizen s” very logical production in the lust Inquirer, or to notice him iu any wuy until he gets buck to the point at issue. He has promised to Iny before the public ;proof of the alleged misconduct of Judge Crawford ; 1 but instead of this, he attempts to sustain his former 'tharges by arguments, how irrelevant and futile it is needless to say. Does not Citizen begin to discover •that it is mucheasierto make a charge than to prove itt