rR-DISTRICT COURT.The Put Week** riadiDf *t the Seat ofJustice.d£tlwPn.itFRIDAY, MAY 8. BTThe Kasold case was given to the j elt; jury about 5 o’clock last evening and i e1 after being out about a half hoar a 103 verdict of guilty was rendered. The j as decision of Justice Charlton was con- j firmed and the prisoner was sen- { tencedto six months in jail. . He I. spent last night with Sheriff Clarke, j cs The case of Hubbard Taylor vs. j lc Moore, a suit on note, was dismissed te this morning. |oiThe arguments on a motion by the a! defendants in the case of Craigmile; nlt; vs. the A. T S. F. road, to have a : hiw i more definite statement made in lt;ha j the petition, were made this morn-^ ing. This case is brought by the1-liPlt;ajatfamily of Mr. Craigmile, who was 0 i knocked off the Santa Fe13 j track at the Eidemilier icehouse by an engine and mkilled one year ago last January. The tiplaintiffs ask for 810,000 damages. . siL-sttenM m•rtmIS!Vny-a.1te1.ter.The case of Jones vs. the A., T. S. F. road was continued until next term.Court was adjourned at 10 o’clock until 2 this afternoon. The ease of Chevalier vs. Pavey was commenced this afternoon. This is a suit for damages on what is alleged to be a fraudulent transfer of real estate.s.;d-firleieieieSATURDAY—9.\Vrnize1tteitlsiwwccr.kEei©idl-aatigr.The time in district court to-day was occupied by the case of Chevalier : c* vs. Pavey. IaiJudge Benson to-day ordered 12 ad-! p dicional jurymen summoned for * Monday. Deputy Sheriff Harbaugh started after them.A divorce was granted last evening in the case of Taylor vs. Taylor, on the grounds of extreme cruelty. The suit was brought by the wife.MONDAY—11.r«hitiThe case of Chevalier vs. Pavey was not finished to-day. The defendant was on the witness stand constantly from Saturday noon until after noon to-day.The divorce case of Mrs. Cresence Maichel vs. Joseph Maiehel, her husband, was filed Saturday evening. The divorce is asked for on the grounds of habitual drunkenness for the past 15 years. The defendant is a well to do it I farmer living in the west part of the ,y j county near the Osage county line, j.. j There' is considerable property in-J j volved. Among other things asked ie ! for by the plaintiff- is enough nionej* _' to educate her two children. j VThe city of End ora has asked for a hi perpetual injunction restraining Peter A. ilartig from plowing up or obstructing certain streets in Endora. This is brought about by an in'.unction asked for several j T.i'RciClti,lehlt;viinCltialnitst:nofettih;niI days ago by restraining the |j. j ci.y of Euicr.t from using Ins prop- ; o* 1(j j eriy sis an approach to the proposed ! fdinKansas ri ver bridge.hiThe twelve additional jurymen jei1G 1 are as follows: A. B. Wade, Win. B. j -u L | Barker, James F. Corel. Wakorusa; ^ B. F. Smith, C. S. Duncan, jr., Sam in Watts, Wm. Hill, Lawrence; JohnL-ofidots.Masferson, Leeoniptou; E. J. Jack, J. si jW. Baldwin, Marion; \V. H. Gill, jj Palmyra; John Honu.ll, Willow ' S vrii.us.?c*