Archbishop Count Lkihx; hows* i, of Posen, who wm arrcated on tho Sul February, remained In prison at Oatrowo, at the data of the lust intelligence, lOtli March. An an instance of the manner in which tho Inw in carried ont, when Faiiieh, the Dean of Oatrowo, applied to the authorities for |**r-tnisaion to the imprisoned Archbishop tohave the Hwintance of hia domesticchaplain in the man*. ami the at-tendnnce of liis private servant, theCourt of Appeal refused to grant this te.jueat, on the ground that Dean Faiukk lmd no right to make snch an application The Archbishop resented tliia decision by refusing to avail himself of tho small altar erected for liis use in the prison. llut after some time, he signed a petition asking, in hia own name, the favour refused on th« application of the Dean. The Archbishop was cited to appear on the lfilh April before tho Kcclcaiastical Court, to show cause why jadginenl should not le panned against him.On occasion of the Archbishop's arrest, tho Prussian iiiahoje and the Bishop of Mayence inauod a pastoral letter to their flocks, in which they declared that they had not fostered rebellion, and that they wen-prepared to obey the civil nntborite* •• in all lawful things hut they could not obey lawn which destroyed tho Church of lt;Jon, by making it dependent on changing Ministries and Parliamentary majorities. Their chief complaint was of the attempt u to foist a Catholic Bishop on the Church,” referring to the appointment of Bishop Rkivkks, an old Catholic.lustful of beiug deterred by this latter, the Ooveruueat has put another Itiahop in prison. On the 7th March, Dr. Kiiruuard, Bishop of Treves, was arrested, and haa been sentenced to imprisonment for two years and three months, for non-]»ayment of tines. A few dava after his nr real. Lha aullini ilit-u