TOTIONDR E B TAYLORFOUND NSThCeorge- [ San Antonio, Tex a- March 16 Dr uponlt;fur, i'4 , C iiivlor, th** K• i* physician, char.* ,killing hi* fSr*• f eousin, j;I S Si if W lt;irmint*. ! ^{llrlpmn- r,4'HT WHbben ille in If*].', i- .1 ’ ffree man following a wrdict of not guil if com- ;,_v a. jury in t.hlt;* Tbirfy-srventh Dis nd the ; trh-t Court Saturday morning, V.-rdict f k' h;i Roads j f jury waa rendered at 10;35 oVlo*-k i ' :'1/'• IWlla S(ifurday morning, following a con*id*ro . ’ | th« '■fw- Ix-ginning at 10:4/5 Fri-Banlc I day night, when District\din* lt;i Ts if t.O9Wells; Mf-Askil) concluded the arguments of the 1**o*vl State \ , r.xprnslt;t good j State. \ verdict lt;**,lt; anticipated byeld in i midnight and the court wan held open r* »** until that hour, but word came from the iew of f twelve men that the verdict would not1 it the ; \a* reached until Katur^lay morn in#.f*dcrdant was visibly affected followttoitd-; in*? the readinjsr of the verdict, for he adfledge vanoed toward the jury box and a hook Fite of tne hand of each juror a* he filed bylet ion. Mr a. Taylor, the defendant's wife, ki**-ue of | ed her husband and the two children%% ha* who have been with her constantly dur*Ftid^e j ing the trial.Id, E.j Dr Taylor was trier! first in William-r Dan- son county following a change of venuefrom Travis county, hut a ^hung” jury resulted in a transfer of the case to j title ate. IWar county, w here the defendant was lt;of men, 41 ’ t* ^ in the state penitentiary, facultyf*he ca-*** * as appealed and reversed by! of theth*- Court of Criminal Appeals whi**h or j and wo dered a new trial. The frial of Dr. Taylor which resulted in ar*| 11 j I taj Saturday morning was begun lt*t Monday morn* j dunemK- I Coursesinn ndef the 3 t fi g W h .e orn pic t isfer fc* cm be ronlv on *ompje?11 mij «t udent* ;* g h mz* tranee #A Iso,./line rHIt.ion mil