Dr. James resolution in regard to erecting a school house in the 4th Wardlt;was taken from the table.Mr. L. W. Leach favored the levying t of a tax for tuition purpose?. tDr. James could find no law author- i iting the City Council to levy a tax for ^ that purpose. He favored the building ^ of a school bouse this season, as the ac-tion of the Normal Trustees to-day makes it essential that buildings should 5 be constructed at once. iMr. Armstrong favored a school nine i months in the year but did not want the j school unless we have a house in which 1 to hold it. To put 400 or 500 childron in four rooms is to make it a pandimo-nium.Mr. Loach thought that the fund already provided for would erect a good house ; and he was in favor of the tax for tuition purposes.Dr. James was in favor of schools but did not want the building fund curtailed. The Doctor was in favor of more school houses or less children.Mr. Armstrong favored the building of a good school houso in every Ward in the city, and wanted houses that would be commodious and that would be a credit to the city.Dr. Jaraos joined the member in the 2d Ward in pleading that there should be no interim m the levy of tax until we have good school houses that will accommodate the children of this city. In reply to Mr. S. C. Moore, the Doctor said be was in ftvor of nine months school just as soon as we have houses in which to keep it,Mr. Pollard, City Attorney, gave it as his legal opinion that the Council has power to levy a tax for tuition.Mr. Kistler moved to lay the resol u-