Ip-illgn.t is een ‘ to * to wnof Vst .tlHl ni s-rere or rere ROl-roy. ban teer iua-ant! ion. iav-ser-ned rorr nae 1 to 1 he not rom ook out ked du-tofor-ipt.80 : he rior i ted ton war was ing few *ta-ira-melibsareHie=. -4;QUITE A WELL LAID PUNPint to Mulct the Coiinty for In o FmIhp Impr s-onment (a^e.FATHER AM) TWO SONS.The Baker Bays—Reward Promised the LjiiN - Scheme Fell Through—'Verdict of Petty lnrceny—Other Crart Matters,Nicholas Baker, one of two young brothers indicted for burglary, was given a trial before Judge Scott yesterday. The jury's verdict was for petty larceny and a few mouths in the county prison will be the penalty. It is likely that the other lad will plead guilty to petty larceny to-day.In the course of the trial a rather unique plot was laid bare. The offense was theft of took and building material from a house in course of construction on the South Side and was committed early in the year. The plunder was carried to a ranch southeast of the city. Wm. Crouch, stepfather of the boys and owner of the suburban place, wfts arrested. He foisted the criminality on the young fellows ami was discharged, they be-i.jg taken up.Wttile the case was in a justice's court, one of the boys testified yesterday, the accused fixed* up a plan of action, bold and original. Their line was for the boys to face the music, exonerating completely the man. The latter would bring an action against the county and recover no less than *6 ,000. Some reform school would he the home of the lads until a pardon could be secured. For their disgrace and deprivation the boys were to receive $100 cash and a bicycle each and all the cigars they could smoke. Great scheme, wasn't it? Came out just like this from the witness stand yesterday.Much time was consumed yesterday in argument as to the competency of certain evidence offered on behalf of the state,Tom Carroll, indicted for assault