,25C.SO.i.$o;l.gu-latpo*fedtedal-7 506 co7 05* 35 9 701 758 xo2 812 CO6 65* 509 501 041 00thezedomin*mt,nd'iy»di-. V -Av-- * •• •: *lt;,='if . ;The feeling of indignation ai theinhuman treatment of Dan. Reilly by Policemen Schneeberger and Harvey is a general one. Not one person in five hundred knows Reilly, or cares personally about him, but -it is a question whether we put men into office to have them beat any person whom they may arrest. While there are some extenuating circumstances in Harvey’s'case, it is still bad enough to warrant the PoliceBoard to revokehis authority; wbile to allow Sehnee-berger to wear th » uniform\of a policeman an «ay longer thanhecessary for bis removal, i3 a disgrace to the entire city.In the case of the vs. Mat. Schneeberger and. John Harvey, tried before ’Squire Pettit yesterday afternoon and this morning, the testimony of witnesses seemed to prove conclusively that the arrest was first made without any cause whatever, and that in taking the man they used violence .which was entirely unnecessary! ’Squire Pettit finedSchneeberger $20 and costs—a total of $35.70—from which action he express^ ed his intention of appealing, vey took a change of venue, clai that he could not have a fair trial before ’Squire Pettit on account of prejudice.